AW: [Meteor-Scatter] MS Procedures

Sun, 4 Jan 2004 17:23:25 +0100

Nothing wrong Charles - in fact absolutely right. I personally don't see any
reason
not to use the cluster to inform that I am calling CQ on a particular QRG,
but others
do not agree... I don't like to "complete" QSO's via the cluster however.

2 CQ QRG's, each for a priod, would have helped me last night to get a
decent copy
of RZ4HF/4 (2550 km away) which was now impossible by the continous CQ
calling HA2004EU,
who - just to make it clear - was working according to procedures as well.

73 - Franz
OE3FVU
-----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]Im Auftrag von Charles
Gesendet: Samstag, 03. J�nner 2004 13:12
An: Tony; G4HGI; [email protected]; [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [Meteor-Scatter] MS Procedures

Its crazy on 370, there is nothing wrong with CQA CQB or CQ366 or whatever,
its one thing calling CQ but I question working a bloke there, all I am
doing is qrm'ng others who are listening, I guess 70% at least of those on
370 are on cluster also, 370 is fine for random but during meteor showers I
just make qsy, best other suggestion was one frequency say 370 for cq South
and East and use another frequency for North&West
Charles EI5FK
ANY SM/LA/OH/ES for test ??

_______________________________________________
Meteor-Scatter mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/meteor-scatter