[Moon-net] Re: [Meteor-Scatter] 144 - Revisions

Thu, 3 Jul 2003 14:24:58 +0200

Well said Tomi, and I ams ure that you don't forget ON4KST and the people
helping him; DL8EBW, G0NFA and many others
that truely help the "average" HAM with excellent new tools !

Thank you !
Franz - OE3FVU

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Holman Tam�s
> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 12:13 PM
> To: MeteorScatter
> Subject: RE: [Moon-net] Re: [Meteor-Scatter] 144 - Revisions
>
>
> ... and the wide spread use of computers, Internet, DX cluster
> and the activity of exceptional guys like DK5YA and EA6VQ who
> help to collect and utilize information for all of us contribute
> to the feeling that solar activity improves our games nowadays.
>
> Thank you
> Best 73 de ha5pt
> Tomi
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: DEHAYS Dominique [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 10:12 AM
> To: David Anderson GM4JJJ
> Cc: Udo Langenohl; [email protected];
> [email protected]; Moon-Net;
> [email protected]; Shelby Ennis, W8WN; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Moon-net] Re: [Meteor-Scatter] 144 - Revisions
>
> Exactly , 2003 very good ES.
> If I look at my observations ( based on only 2 solar cycles) , it
> seems to
> me that the period of the solar cycle corresponding to goingg from max to
> min ( descending slope) gives very good Es on 2mtr . Nothing scientific
> here , just an idea
>
> 73's Dom/F6DRO
> _______________________________________________
> Meteor-Scatter mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/meteor-scatter
> _______________________________________________
> Meteor-Scatter mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/meteor-scatter
>