[Meteor-Scatter] FSK441

Mon, 19 Aug 2002 09:52:36 +0100

Hi Art

We need to get this sorted before to long. I don't see what difference it
make's if we use +/- or letters so long as we all know what's going on. The
most important thing is that we all work to the same procedures along with
stopping clx reporting during the qso, for me if my sked partner announces
got you and sending 27 on the clx then the qso is dead.

We all need to ensure we bring credibility to the mode, after all thanks to
Joe we now have allot of MS Stations giving more activity.

73 Tony (G0GMS IO82XT)

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected]
[mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of swain
Sent: 19 August 2002 09:26
To: [email protected]
Subject: [Meteor-Scatter] FSK441

Hi All, A lot of good stuff has been talked about during the last few days
regarding FSK441 procedures. 144,370 was very busy with a number of well
known 'big' stations holding qsos there. I agree with Gabrile EA6VQ about
the general HSCW MS preocedures being acceptable for FSK441 with the
exception of the CQ offset. My own preference is for CQDx or CQUx, with x
being the offset from the CQ frequency. (not necessarily from ,370). regards
to all Art G3KWY

--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed.
Please post in Plain-Text only.---
_______________________________________________
Meteor-Scatter mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/meteor-scatter