[Meteor-Scatter] WSJT : lets think about procedure

[fa00416@flashnet.it]

Hello David!

>In my opinion it is best to define a sub-band within each VHF/UHF band for
>weak-signal narrow-band
>digital communications first and then allocate specifics later (normally by
>the mjority of operators).
>
 That might be a good "soft solution" indeed

>One point regarding WSJT. Why do some ops use this abbreviation as a
>definition of a mode.
>For example - 'Tx 1st period 144.370MHz WSJT beaming 090 degrees'.
>
>WSJT is the term for a whole suite of programs.
>
>More appropriately ops should use FSK441 or JT44 to identify what they are
>transmitting.
>

On my opinion it's not a big  problem, it's like SSB, atcually we all mean USB
when we look for  a USB MS sked. Only if LSB is specified then the sked is
meant to
be run on LSB.
WSJT first releases  contained only FSK441, that is why, I think, the matter
started as WSJT mode.


Thank you for efforts you do to solve the "band assigning" problem.

73 de IK0BZY Enrico