[MAMS] Fw: Band-Plan

[Scott]

I don't see the 902-928 draft here...the band plan on the ARRL website 
is the one from 1989...where exactly is the proposed "nes" band plan at?

N0EDV


On 4-4-2012 21:19, MARK K8MD wrote:
> Dave it seems its pretty stupid for them to put SSTV in weak signal area. I had a guy nearby a couple years ago running SSTV on 2M and trashed the 2M weak signal area  I was glad when I heard he got divorced and lost his job and moved.
>
> --- On Wed, 4/4/12, Dave Calvert<kb0pe at yahoo.com>  wrote:
>
> From: Dave Calvert<kb0pe at yahoo.com>
> Subject: [MAMS] Fw:  Band-Plan
> To: "Mid-America Microwave Society"<mams at mailman.qth.net>
> Date: Wednesday, April 4, 2012, 6:06 PM
>
> Here it is . . . . . . . . . .
> ______________________________________________________
>   
>
>   
>
>    
> ARRL Seeks Comments on Proposed 33 cm Band Plan 
>   
> 04/03/2012 
> A few months ago, the ARRL UHF/Microwave Band Plan Committee _asked the 
> Amateur Radio community about current, planned and projected uses of the 
> amateur bands between 902 MHz-3.5 GHz_ 
> (http://www.arrl.org/news/arrl-committee-seeks-microwave-band-plan-input) .
> The response was beyond our expectations, with hundreds of comments and
> suggestions received. Thanks to all of you who took the time to share information
> with us. 
> After reading the feedback, the Committee began working on the band plans, 
> and the draft plan for 33 cm (902-928 MHz) is now ready for your review. 
> Please take a moment to look over the accompanying draft and let us know if 
> you have any major concerns. As a reminder, there are still a few days left 
> to comment on the _draft 9 cm band plan_ 
> (http://www.arrl.org/news/arrl-seeks-comments-on-proposed-9-cm-band-plan)
> released earlier this month. The purpose of these band plans is to share information
> about how our bands are being used and to suggest compatible frequency ranges for
> various types of application. We recognize that local conditions or needs may 
> necessitate deviations from a band plan, and regional frequency coordinating bodies 
> may recommend alternatives for use in their respective regions. 
> Please submit your comments via _e-mail_ 
> (mailto:microwave-band-plan at arrl.org) comments by May 7, 2012. Thank you once
> again for helping us complete this important project. 
>
>   
>   ------
> ______________________________________________________________
> MAMS mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mams
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:MAMS at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> ______________________________________________________________
> MAMS mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/mams
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:MAMS at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
>
>

--