[Lowfer] LF ham bands

[N1BUG]

Yes... and now the HF operators think LF is a useless band! ;-)

I would like to try 900 and 1800 second periods on 630 meters, but it 
will be some time before I get new equipment built for that band.

Paul


On 10/21/2020 2:56 PM, Douglas Williams wrote:
> That makes sense. The lower the frequency, the less QSB. That's why they
> gave us Hams the "useless" HF bands back in the day, eh? :-)
> 
> D. KB4OER
> 
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 2:51 PM N1BUG <paul at n1bug.com> wrote:
> 
>> I'm not certain about 630 meters. I'm not currently active there so I
>> just know what I see being announced on the various forums. I know there
>> has been some FST4W-300 but am not sure if anyone is currently doing it.
>> A week or so ago I saw at least one European say he would try FST4W-1800
>> but I'm not sure how that test went.
>>
>> I think many people feel the QSB cycle is too fast for the very long
>> periods on 630 meters. That may be. I recall it was faster than on 2200
>> meters. 1800 seconds is working out very well on the lower band.
>>
>> 73,
>> Paul
>>
>>
>>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Lowfer mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
> Post must be less than 50KB total for message plus attachment!
> 
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>