[Lowfer] Lowfer TAG?

[N8OOU Mike]

Jay,

I agree with your idea regarding upgrading lowfers to more current
technology.  I have used the new mode for receiving on 2200m. It seems to
have great potential.

However, think about the equipment needed to transmit this mode vs QRSS .

Mike  N8OOU    73

On Tue, Oct 20, 2020, 5:15 PM jrusgrove at comcast.net <jrusgrove at comcast.net>
wrote:

> John
>
> #12?
>
> How about FST4W-1800 or combination FST4W-1800 / QRSS on the other half
> hour both on same frequency in the watering hole? GPS 1pps & NMEA could
> discipline computer time.
>
> Think lowfers would have a much bigger audience, and perhaps more stations
> interested in transmitting, if they moved on to modern digital modes. Look
> at 630 and 2200 meters ... QRSS is all but dead ... unlikely to ever
> return. Just like lowfer moved on from aural copy to QRSS ... it's probably
> time to move on to digital.
>
> Jay W1VD
>
> p.s. flame suit at the ready ;-)
> ______________________________________________________________
> Lowfer mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
> Post must be less than 50KB total for message plus attachment!
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>