[Lowfer] Got my approval from the UTC today

[William E. Isakson]

Still. Douglass and Bill,  the process of giving an approval does add clout
to the UTC position.  You can expect more in the future I think.


--------


Bill Isakson     AC6QV
Roseburg, Oregon USA
bill.isakson at gmail.com



On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Douglas Williams <
williamsdoug1966 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Bill, you are exactly right. They are under no obligation to inform us if
> we are not too close, only if we are.
>
> D.
>
> On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Bill Cromwell <wrcromwell at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Doug,
> >
> > It's nice that they told you are not too close to one the affected PLC
> > systems. However, they are not tasked with telling you that. They are
> only
> > tasked with telling any of us if we *are* too close to one of those. They
> > probably have a lot of coffee to drink, the web to browse at work, and
> > early afternoon golf to play and are not required to inform us if we are
> in
> > the clear. Wasting their time by telling you that your station is clear
> of
> > PLCs is an *option* for a slow morning at UTC :) They can merely drink
> > their coffee, browse the web, and go golfing for 30 days (or any other
> > *real* work they may have to do).
> >
> > The approval or not is already made by the FCC. Now your mission should
> > you decide to accept it is to get on the air on those new bands :)
> >
> > 73,
> >
> > Bill KU8H
> >
> >
> >
> ______________________________________________________________
> Lowfer mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
> Post must be less than 50KB total for message plus attachment!
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>