[Lowfer] Watering hole last night in TN

[Douglas Williams]

Mike,

Ah, now I see what you are doing. Yes, I agree that the graphic is easier
to ID. Interesting experiment.

On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 8:57 AM, N8OOU <n8oou at meekfarm.us> wrote:

> Doug,
>
> Thanks for the WM capture. I am currently sending in two modes using a QRP
> Labs U3S as the exciter. A FSKCW letter, followed by the graphical version.
> To my eye, the graphic is a little easier to ID than the FSK.
> Interesting,,,,  Thanks.
>
> 73   de   N8OOU - Mike Meek
>
>
> On 11/24/2015 07:25 AM, Douglas Williams wrote:
>
>> Also monitored the 185.3 kHz Lowfer "watering hole" last night. Good copy
>> on SJ, SIW, graphical WM, and one decent capture of TAG (see second
>> capture
>> for TAG).
>>
>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/33457409/112415%2001.jpg
>>
>> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/33457409/112415%2002.jpg
>>
>>
>> I'm a bit confused as to what I'm seeing intermixed with the WM graphical
>> ID between SJ and SIW. Are those mixing products, or is WM transmitting
>> Morse as well as a graphical ID?
>>
>> 73, Doug KB4OER
>> ______________________________________________________________
>> Lowfer mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
>> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>> Post must be less than 50KB total for message plus attachment!
>>
>> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
>> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>>
>>
>> ______________________________________________________________
> Lowfer mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
> Post must be less than 50KB total for message plus attachment!
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>