[Lowfer] possible WI reception in CO last night

[jrusgrove at comcast.net]

Mark

>Since I did not get a unambiguous and clear "WI", I don't consider it a true "catch", but I'm 
>puting it up for your consideration.

Agree. No doubt you were receiving WI's signal based on your captures. This proves that the path and 
your receiving system is up to the task. I always consider that the first 'major hurdle' as 
sometimes it takes a quite a while longer to get a full callsign with all ID characters clearly 
displayed. Recall spending nearly a month a few years back getting a clear ID on BR. Early on it was 
clear that it was his signal but the final 'proof' took a lot longer.

Of course, everyone is entitled to their own threshold for making the call ;~)

Jay W1VD  WD2XNS  WE2XGR/2


----- Original Message ----- 
From: <mbdittmar at comcast.net>
To: <lowfer at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2013 10:17 PM
Subject: [Lowfer] possible WI reception in CO last night


>
>
> Hi All-
>
>
>
> I had a possible capture of WI last night here in Denver CO. The W can be seen, and part of an I 
> elsewhere. The W has the characteristic curvature of WI's transmission and is at the reported 
> frequency of 187.5065 or so. Since I did not get a unambiguous and clear "WI", I don't consider it 
> a true "catch", but I'm puting it up for your consideration.
>
>
> http://i1324.photobucket.com/albums/u604/mbdittmar/capt0007_zpsbe4d3c0e.gif
>
>
>
> http://i1324.photobucket.com/albums/u604/mbdittmar/capt0009_zps04ea86a2.gif
>
>
>
> 73 Mark ABØCW / MBD
> ______________________________________________________________
> Lowfer mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
> Post must be less than 50KB total for message plus attachment!
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html