[Lowfer] [EXTERNAL]Re: SAQ TEST TRANSMISSION 2012-01-12
Howell, Laurence J
L.Howell at conocophillips.com
Tue Jan 10 11:18:47 EST 2012
Its certainly more noisy in Alaska at 1200/1400Z too with QRN coming in from the SW and AsiaPac -
Signals werent all that hot - SAQ peaked about 15dB above noise in Alaska. I heard and saw nothing from Okie - not even the Alphas were evident this morning.
Laurence KL7UK
-----Original Message-----
From: lowfer-bounces at mailman.qth.net [mailto:lowfer-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of ToddRoberts2001 at aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2012 9:50 AM
To: lowfer at mailman.qth.net
Subject: [EXTERNAL]Re: [Lowfer] SAQ TEST TRANSMISSION 2012-01-12
In a message dated 1/10/2012 10:38:47 A.M. Eastern Standard Time,
dexter.mc at gmail.com writes:
Well I just missed receiving the QRN anyway. If you didn't hear it I
didn't stand a chance.
Tnx,
Dex
Hi Dex,
I have noticed before that the usual times that SAQ transmits
-1200UTC or this time 1330UTC, are usually the worst time
of the day for VLF propagation from Europe. Signals like
22.1 from the UK run 20 over S9 in the evenings around
0000UTC but drop to S7 or less buried in the noise around
1200-1330UTC.
We should write to SAQ again and ask if they would
consider another nighttime transmission to the USA. I think
they were heard better in Europe during their last nighttime
transmission also.
Propagation is variable on VLF from day to night just like on
higher bands. A path of darkness is the best. Sometimes good
signals are heard in the daytime but much more likely during a
path of darkness.
73 - Todd WD4NGG
______________________________________________________________
Lowfer mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the Lowfer
mailing list