[Lowfer] 2200 Meter request for NPRM

[k2ors at verizon.net]

Zack,
           This is all I could find in the WE2XTU application:

"the applicant proposes to use the frequencies, emissions, and locations in the above
application to examine antenna designs, perfect antenna designs, and make new
antenna designs employing unusual material velocity factors in order to reduce
antenna size while keeping or increasing antenna efficiency."

73 Warren K2ORS
          WD2XGJ
          WD2XSH/23
          WE2XEB/2
          WE2XGR/1


Jan 13, 2010 10:44:01 AM, lowfer at mailman.qth.net wrote:

===========================================

130 kHz to 450 GHz? What kind of experiments is he doing?

Being a microwave experimenter myself, I think I am in contact with just
about every other microwave/mm wave experimenter in the USA and several
overseas. I have never seen his name come up anywhere in those circles
before.

73, Zack W9SZ

On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 9:18 AM,  wrote:

> John,
>          This same guy ( The holder of WE2XTU ) filed a modification
> request for WE2XTU for frequencies from 130kHz t o 450 GHz recently for some
> type of antenna experiment.
>
>          I think the danger here is the guy has no idea what he is doing,
> he assumes that he will get 1W ERP from 100 Watts transmitter output power,
> which is unlikely.  Also I remain firmly against the 1W ERP limit which in
> many cases is insufficient power and there is no reason (other than perhaps
> fire safety ) to limit the power so low.
>
>
> 73 Warren K2ORS
>          WD2XGJ
>          WD2XSH/23
>          WE2XEB/2
>          WE2XGR/1
>
>
> Jan 12, 2010 11:12:10 AM, lowfer at mailman.qth.net wrote:
>
> ===========================================
>
> Have been meaning to mention this, but it had slipped my mind. A posting
> last month on the LWCA Message Board from James Whedbee, holder of WE2XTU,
> cites a request he filed with the FCC to establish a Notice of Proposed
> Rulemaking to establish an Amateur band at 135.7-137.9 kHz. The text of his
> request may be seen at:
> http://fjallfoss.fcc.gov/ecfs/document/view?id=7020350648
>
> The gist of his argument is that considerable Amateur and Experimental
> operation has taken place in the band since RM-9404 was rejected, and no
> interference appears to have been caused. He claims that with 1 watt ERP and
> a maximum transmitter output power of 100 watts, interference is unlikely.
>
> Just from a technical point of view, I would hate to see that 100 watt
> limit, as many practical backyard antennas could not meet 1 watt ERP with
> it. From a tactical point of view, if the FCC slams the door on a "lone
> wolf" applicant, then it only increases the waiting time before a larger
> organization like the ARRL could approach without being told "we just said
> no!"
>
> Anyway, it's food for thought. Has anyone been aware of any on-air 2200
> meter operation by WE2XTU? His license covers a number of other frequency
> ranges, as well.
>
> John, W1TAG
> ______________________________________________________________
> Lowfer mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> ______________________________________________________________
> Lowfer mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
______________________________________________________________
Lowfer mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html