[Lowfer] LF Receivers?

jrusgrove at comcast.net jrusgrove at comcast.net
Mon Dec 20 22:30:03 EST 2010


Bill

Have many receivers here but the best bang for the buck is the R75. The high stability oscillator 
option is a worthwhile upgrade.

Jay W1VD  WD2XNS  WE2XGR/2


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill & Becky" <wmarvin at hickorytech.net>
To: "Discussion of the Lowfer (US, European, &amp;UK) and MedFer bands" <lowfer at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 5:34 PM
Subject: [Lowfer] LF Receivers?


> Hi Group  I'm in the process of replacing my TT 320D receiver.  I'm looking for opinions on which 
> receiver for LW QRSS, NDB and below 6MHz.
>
> I do not fancy getting a Transceiver because of the added cost and I'm not interested in SSB/CW HF 
> QSO's
>
> I'm looking for time tested experience by you.........where the rubber meets the road.
>
> You may send your thoughts off list to  wmarvin at hickorytech.net
>
> Best Holidays to All
>
> Bill  KB9IV
> ______________________________________________________________
> Lowfer mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html 



More information about the Lowfer mailing list