[Lowfer] LF Receivers?
jrusgrove at comcast.net
jrusgrove at comcast.net
Mon Dec 20 22:30:03 EST 2010
Bill
Have many receivers here but the best bang for the buck is the R75. The high stability oscillator
option is a worthwhile upgrade.
Jay W1VD WD2XNS WE2XGR/2
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill & Becky" <wmarvin at hickorytech.net>
To: "Discussion of the Lowfer (US, European, &UK) and MedFer bands" <lowfer at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2010 5:34 PM
Subject: [Lowfer] LF Receivers?
> Hi Group I'm in the process of replacing my TT 320D receiver. I'm looking for opinions on which
> receiver for LW QRSS, NDB and below 6MHz.
>
> I do not fancy getting a Transceiver because of the added cost and I'm not interested in SSB/CW HF
> QSO's
>
> I'm looking for time tested experience by you.........where the rubber meets the road.
>
> You may send your thoughts off list to wmarvin at hickorytech.net
>
> Best Holidays to All
>
> Bill KB9IV
> ______________________________________________________________
> Lowfer mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
More information about the Lowfer
mailing list