[Lowfer] 1750 meter frequency for Part 5?

[Peter Barick]

Hi All,

I agree here, saying the "watering hole has all but dried up" is presumptuous and may be the result of geographical interpretation. Still if there is a bit of actuality in that sentiment it may not also hold up some tomorrow. Traditionally the watering hole served just that purpose - a gathering point for very weak Part-15 signaling. Any threat to that should be weighed carefully for the greater good.

Of course, as has been stated, one can try and see, ie, test the waters for a time.

I commend the parties for at least considering potential impacts. We should all work towards viable compromise.

Cheers - Peter
-------------------
>>> "Charlie , W5COV" <cvest at cox.net> 10/28/09 10:22 AM >>>
The grabbers have gone away , but the watering hole hasn't dried up . There 
are at least 3 station on it 24 / 7 at the current time and 2 more that I 
remember off of the top of my head that were on it during the "season" just 
passed . There are also at least 2 more at least considering moving to it 
also .

Charlie , W5COV 

______________________________________________________________
Lowfer mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Lowfer at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html