[Lowfer] The Jammer

Mike-WE0H we0h at yahoo.com
Mon Jan 26 14:27:55 EST 2009


That's good. Your /2 signal is never way strong but the /6 signal is 
alway 12 db stronger than your kilowatt. That is the only signal that is 
tough to work around for some and is the signal many mentioned last 
night as causing issues for receiving in the band up higher. Oh well, 
you guys are nice people having fun on the band. I fixed my rig with a 
tight IF filter so no trouble working others in the band now. Others 
will have to buy good IF filters I guess.

I'll quit complaining or mentioning anything related to high power 
stations on the Part 5 bands for now on. Sorry to upset you guys.

Mike
WE0H
/16



jrusgrove at comcast.net wrote:
> So then...it wasn't one of  the 'high power' Part 5 stations causing 
> problems after all?
>
> Jay W1VD  WD2XNS  WE2XGR/2
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "J. B. Weazle McCreath"
>
>
>   
>> Hi Mike, Lowfers,
>>
>> The same signal that was desensing me last evening is still present
>> here on Monday morning.  It's a more or less steady carrier on
>> or near 506.732 kHz. when viewed with Spectron.   It must
>> be something local, as none of the other guys complained
>> of it last evening.
>>
>> 73, J.B., VE3EAR - VE3WZL
>> Solar and wind powered
>> Lowfer " EAR"  188.830
>> EN93dr
>>
>> http://www.hurontel.on.ca/~weazle


More information about the Lowfer mailing list