[Lowfer] TAG WOLF

Sun Jun 1 20:45:20 EDT 2008

John

A couple more runs from earlier tonight. Not sure I'll ever get first line 
decode...the extra distance seems to make a big difference. Will listen for 
your WSPR later.

Jay

2008-06-01 23:08:29 >WOLF10  -r 8000.980 -f 800 -t 1.0 -w 0.0000
t:  24 f:-0.180 a:-0.3 dp: 77.2 ci: 4 cj:272 U99L*H???/*YIOX ?
t:  48 f: 0.114 a:-0.0 dp: 77.4 ci:13 cj:447 /Y39O7L0A0IADGR ?
t:  96 f:-0.190 a: 0.4 dp: 72.8 ci:13 cj:274 ENHRX5E6BFY3Y0  ?
t: 192 f: 0.635 pm:4.071 jm:800 q:-14.6 -7.7 9P0V RS1RPE2ZSK ?
t: 288 f:-0.625 pm:6.289 jm:840 q:-11.9 -7.8 C FOKDBJQ6J8E Q ?
t: 384 f: 0.889 pm:9.989 jm:615 q:-10.2 -8.0 HA4VJI???LPJF5S ?
t: 480 f:-0.684 pm:12.72 jm:640 q: -9.7 -9.5 ???1CLUOC6UF/10 ?
t: 576 f: 0.000 pm:17.54 jm:121 q: -6.4 -7.3 HDQ8J4Y7ZNWMPU2 ?
t: 672 f: 0.000 pm:23.71 jm:121 q: -5.1 -9.4 4IO RAYKHGO.MJN ?
t: 768 f: 0.000 pm:34.31 jm:121 q: -4.3 -7.5 NYW RAYMOND ME  ?
t: 864 f: 0.000 pm:40.01 jm:121 q: -3.7 -4.9 TAG RAYMOND ME  -
2008-06-01 23:24:13 >WOLF10  -r 8000.980 -f 800 -t 1.0 -w 0.0000
t:  24 f: 0.076 a:-0.5 dp: 84.9 ci: 0 cj:  0 KM2C8KI7MB6LZFF ?
t:  48 f: 0.014 a: 0.9 dp: 82.4 ci: 7 cj:190 0E/90I???OQB*V* ?
t:  96 f:-0.223 a:-0.2 dp: 79.7 ci: 7 cj:370 LHHDC7RC1UWTS3A ?
t: 192 f: 0.381 pm:8.665 jm:105 q:-13.4 -6.2 24W.8 6NZ3UGMW  ?
t: 288 f: 0.264 pm:10.48 jm:583 q:-13.2 -7.8 9ERKX3???V83LTB ?
t: 384 f: 0.957 pm:12.68 jm:249 q:-11.0 -7.8 57VE0Z4*XCR8RWJ ?
t: 480 f:-0.645 pm:13.83 jm:124 q: -9.7 -6.8 4V9.F/C*9V8KY8S ?
t: 576 f: 0.010 pm:15.59 jm:472 q: -9.9 -8.1 M11040LSGG0*8Z. ?
t: 672 f: 0.010 pm:16.25 jm:472 q: -9.2 -8.2  UFG9U42OAQ6WAJ ?
t: 768 f: 0.000 pm:25.15 jm:275 q: -4.7 -9.2 25BGSYYMOKI2P0H ?
t: 864 f: 0.000 pm:31.25 jm:275 q: -3.9 -6.0 TAG RAYMO S7520 -
t: 960 f: 0.000 pm:40.24 jm:275 q: -2.9 -5.2 TAG RAYMOND ME  -
t:1056 f: 0.000 pm:48.13 jm:275 q: -2.2 -4.5 TAG RAYMOND ME  -
t:1152 f: 0.000 pm:50.64 jm:275 q: -2.1 -4.0 TAG RAYMOND ME  -
t:1248 f: 0.000 pm:57.10 jm:275 q: -1.5 -3.9 TAG RAYMOND ME  -
2008-06-01 23:46:21 >WOLF10  -r 8000.980 -f 800 -t 1.0 -w 0.0000
t:  24 f: 0.048 a:-1.0 dp: 85.5 ci:15 cj:418 HF/5Z36O6VLS942 ?
t:  48 f: 0.507 a:-1.1 dp: 82.4 ci: 3 cj: 28 FZHPU8UY4???PN0 ?
t:  96 f: 0.181 a:-0.2 dp: 78.6 ci: 4 cj:406 /8HZCD53CRFN??? ?
t: 192 f: 0.078 pm:8.878 jm:496 q:-11.2 -6.5 X.X4XR1LI17SKUC -
t: 288 f: 0.264 pm:10.50 jm:123 q:-11.5 -8.2 B6AS*CFZHVCC3X6 ?
t: 384 f: 0.078 pm:11.22 jm:496 q: -9.4 -7.6 PKV98N88GI2O0W9 ?
t: 480 f: 0.000 pm:17.56 jm:442 q: -5.6 -8.2 GAG9J S1R7JH*EM ?
t: 576 f: 0.000 pm:30.51 jm:442 q: -4.0 -5.9 TAG RAYMOND ME  -
t: 672 f: 0.000 pm:36.16 jm:443 q: -2.9 -3.8 TAG RAYMOND ME  -

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "John Andrews" <w1tag at w1tag.com>
To: "Discussion of the Lowfer (US, European, &amp; UK) and MedFer bands" 
<lowfer at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Sunday, June 01, 2008 11:15 AM
Subject: Re: [Lowfer] TAG WOLF

> JR,
>
> Thanks for the report! I listened for a while last night, and had some 
> late decodes due to the static. Each run eventually produced something, 
> though.
>
> It's interesting how long the run can go with frequency and frame locks 
> but no decode. This obviously only happens under really lousy signal to 
> noise conditions. Having this beacon running full time will be 
> interesting. Daytime copy here is easy, with some first-line decodes.
>
> I'm going to check my GPS UNlocked reference here at home, as I think it 
> has wandered.
>
> Thanks.
>
> John A.
>
> _______________________________________________
>>From the Lowfer mailing list
> Send messages to: Lowfer at mailman.qth.net
> To sub/unsub visit: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer 