[Lowfer] New Ham Licensing

[Mark Langenfeld]

Peter has placed his finger squarely on what I think is a major problem
for the service (and, perhaps, an unintended result of no-code and other
restructuring in the recent past). Historically, local clubs and
individuals (Elmers) provided the support structure to assist newbies
through their initial learning and licensing struggles.  Along with that
came some "socialization" in the hobby.  As newly minted Novices and
Generals, we wanted nothing more than to develop a fist like or operate
like our mentors. 

With the advent of no-code tickets that can be won largely by reference
to a mail-order study guide, however, the newbie's need to tap into or
rely upon the existing ham community became far less. Clearly, many do
not. (Nowadays it's not particularly difficult to study for and aquire a
license, buy gear and get on the air without even speaking to another
ham other than briefly at the exam session.) So, unless we take the
initiative, none of us should profess surprise that many newbies don't
operate like, sound like, or in any way want to emulate us old-timers.
Why should they?

A final comment re the ARRL's new Novice proposal:  I would find it a
lot easier to swallow (with all privileges described) if it reverted to
the one-term, non-renewable format of the original (extended, perhaps,
to two years). That would make it the true "entry-level" class the
League claims it to be, rather than just an "easy ticket."  A
reconstituted Novice class could be a great entre for a whole new
generation of hams, but only if it doesn't turn into a dead end.  Up or
out.  

Mark -- WA9ETW

> 
> But the worst thing we as "mature" hams can do is ignore or isolate the
> newbies over past prejudices or dour perceptions of the new regs.
> Hopefully we'll set the pace by example and encouragement -- even help
> -- on their expected tribulations as they TOO explore this hobby and
> "public service" avocation. As in all things, someone has to make that
> first step. Are we ready to do so?
> 
> Amen ... and regards,
> Peter
> ----------------------------
>