[Lowfer] WE,UWL,VD,WA,NC,TAG.

[Chris Lantaff]

The sig below UWL would be me, YK.  Unfortunately when checking the
transmitter this morning I found my current reading was half of what it
should have been.  So just a guess but probably a pretty nasty looking
signal and blown transistor.  Since sigs have been looking pretty good guess
I need to go out into the dark cold windy drizzle and retrieve the amp.

 Chris,  KE9YK


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "WE0H" <we0h@gentekcom.com>
To: <lowfer@mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 8:23 PM
Subject: RE: [Lowfer] WE,UWL,VD,WA,NC,TAG.


> Dang, that is so cool looking. Awesome job Lewis. For being so far south,
> you have a good receive location. I also see something below Eric's
signal.
> Maybe some software tweaking will bring it out of the noise.
>
> Mike>WE0H
>
>