[Lowfer] TAG slowing down

Mon, 21 Oct 2002 22:43:27 -0500

OK, I'll speed things up a bit.

Mike>WE0H
http://www.we0h.us/lf.html
185.3026kc QRSS-40 & CW@15wpm
ID is "WE"

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
Behalf Of Bill Ashlock
Sent: Monday, October 21, 2002 10:32 PM
To: lowfer
Subject: Re: [Lowfer] TAG slowing down

John A, Mike R,

Isn't slowing our signals down defeating the purpose of capturing at a
slower rate? IE: Allowing us to observe the different fade patterns between
the six of us. I thought the general rule of thumb was to insure QRSS
signals have less dot time than the fade cycle time (as is the reason why
the best HiFer QRSS dot times are so much lower in duration). I'm seeing a
fade pattern that is about 30 seconds on some nights. Even shorter on
others. Interested in your's and other's opinions on this.

Bill

>I'll do YA one better -121.

>TAG will be running DFCW120 tonight, with dots on 185.3015 and dashes on
>185.3016. That should look a little cleaner on Mitch's 90 second ARGO
>screen.Get more from the Web.  FREE MSN Explorer download :
http://explorer.msn.com

--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
  text/plain (text body -- kept)
  text/html
The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed.
Please post in Plain-Text only.---
_______________________________________________
From the Lowfer mailing list
Send messages to: [email protected]
To sub/unsub visit: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
_____________________________________________________
This message scanned for viruses by CoreComm