[Lowfer] TAG slowing down
Bill Ashlock
[email protected]
Mon, 21 Oct 2002 23:32:13 -0400
John A, Mike R,
Isn't slowing our signals down defeating the purpose of capturing at a sl=
ower rate? IE: Allowing us to observe the different fade patterns between=
the six of us. I thought the general rule of thumb was to insure QRSS si=
gnals have less dot time than the fade cycle time (as is the reason why t=
he best HiFer QRSS dot times are so much lower in duration). I'm seeing a=
fade pattern that is about 30 seconds on some nights. Even shorter on ot=
hers. Interested in your's and other's opinions on this.
Bill
>I'll do YA one better -121.
>TAG will be running DFCW120 tonight, with dots on 185.3015 and dashes on
>185.3016. That should look a little cleaner on Mitch's 90 second ARGO
>screen.Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explo=
rer.msn.com
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed.
Please post in Plain-Text only.---