[Lowfer] dot3 purchase request!

[NICK & KATHY NICHOLSON]

I had no idea that you guys could become so bored at this time of
year......................

Nick...W1ATT



----- Original Message -----
From: "Mike Staines" <Mike_Staines@Email.com>
To: <lowfer@mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, October 01, 2002 5:40 PM
Subject: RE: [Lowfer] dot3 purchase request!


> In re:
>                                           }
> Mike Staines dba "All that static, Inc.,  }     Good Guy
>                                           }
>
>                                                 V.
>                                           }
> Bill Ashlock (AKA "The White Haired One") }
> John Andrews (AKA "That broadcast guy")   }     Perpetrators
> Jay Russgrove (AKA "VD - Not just a call")}
> et al...                                  }
>
> Gentlemen:
>
> Your little squabble  has been brought to my attention that you have
> attempted to buy/sell/swap the ownership/interest/rights in a certain band
> of radio frequencies.
>
> It is not my intention to comment upon, influence, or otherwise cast
> judgment on this silly scam. I must point out, however, that the outcome
of
> this will have a direct impact on my global business.
>
> I am an inventor. Among may of may patents that you might be familiar
with,
> I hold the patent for the concept that Electricity is actually common
smoke
> encased in parts (what happens when a part breaks? The smoke escapes and
the
> equipment stops working). I own the patent for that little bird that keeps
> bobbing it's head into the water. But it is not these patents that you are
> violating.
>
> Please allow me to elaborate. I am the holder of US Patent No. 185666
which
> grants me exclusive rights to create and broadcast static. I have had to
> work with every administration in every country in order to secure the
> rights to generate static globally. It should be clear to you technical
> types that when you generate your beacon signals you "step on" the static
> that would normally be present. In fact, I understand that some of the so
> called "Lowfers" that try to receive your signals actually take drastic
> steps to REMOVE the static that we lovingly generate.
>
> As you might understand, this is an expensive undertaking. Do you know
what
> it costs to send broadband static into space so it could reflect off of
> Jupiter? It don't come cheap! And what about our static generating
facility?
> Just think about what it costs to house, power and maintain 3.7 billion
> Hover canister vacuum cleaners in a dust free environment!
>
> Clearly, we have a right to recoup our investment.
>
> As long as you guys operate outside law and regulation I concede that
> litigation will be difficult. But once one of you "owns" a slice of
> bandwidth, I will exercise my right to be reimbursed for the static that
you
> are destroying.
>
> Let's be rational. The world needs static. Without static, how would
anyone
> know if an antenna is connected or not? Without static, how would we know
to
> get off the couch, turn off the TV, and go to bed? Without static... well,
I
> think you "hear my noise".
>
> Regards,
> Mike Staines
> President and CSO
> AllThatStatic, Inc. LLP.
>
> cc:
> Attorney Howie Skruem, Esq.
>
> _______________________________________________
> >From the Lowfer mailing list
> Send messages to: Lowfer@mailman.qth.net
> To sub/unsub visit: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
>