[Lowfer] Frequency correction

[Lewis Denton]

Hi Bill,
   I have been looking at some of the captures in my files, And what i did
(lowering the freq.) might just make it worse.
we are only about .3 or .4 Hz apart, i might have put it on top of you, will
let it run tonight and see how it looks, maybe some one can get a capture
and see what i have did.
It is very un stable running at that voltage, might just pull the plug till
I can get another chip.
Lewis

God Bless America
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Ashlock" <ashlockw@hotmail.com>
To: <lowfer@mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, November 05, 2002 10:56 AM
Subject: [Lowfer] Frequency correction


> 185.3ers,
>
> I have claimed 185.300 for 3 years, but I have allowed WA to gradually
drift
> a bit low without correction because it didn't used to be that important.
> When Lewis came on claiming 185.3004, it looked to me that he was close to
> 185.300, but I wasn't sure that the capturer's calibration was that
> accurate. Now it's become fairly certain that I am .5 Hz low and Lewis is
> actually very close to 185.300.
>
> Lewis, I hope you can find an easy way to shift your frequency up just a
> smidge so that it is close to 185.3004. I don't really want to sound
'pushy'
> and certainly want you to remain within the 185.300 group. Can you modify
> the frequency by changing the Vcc to your Epson clock?
>
> I would never have believed as late as a year ago that we could
successfully
> pack so many signals in such a narrow band of frequencies. This is great!
>
> Bill A
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Choose an Internet access plan right for you -- try MSN!
> http://resourcecenter.msn.com/access/plans/default.asp
>
> _______________________________________________
> >From the Lowfer mailing list
> Send messages to: Lowfer@mailman.qth.net
> To sub/unsub visit: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer
>