[LogPlus] The End - or NOT?
Zoli Pitman HA1AG
[email protected]
Mon, 17 Mar 2003 14:15:06 +0100
Yo,
Well, I tested a few logging software available and did not like DX4WIN at
all. First because of the way it looks (the best I can say that it's GUI has
lots of room to improve) and second, because the data format is not
available. The core of Logplus is DBase, what I can manipulate in Excel or
Access.
The best I have found so far is the AAlog of RZ4AG. It's functionality
really matches with the ones of LogPlus!.
I have no plans to migrate to other sw as Logplus serves me very well and I
do not need support for a working software as it is not a car, which can
break down.
What I really want to know if Bob Winters could give the code of the Dos
version away. I did some programming myself and I wouldn't mind putting some
work into it and correct the bugs it still has and make the updates FREE for
the users once registered. I tried to call Bob on the number I had of him,
but couldn't reach him on that number anymore.
Could someone please put me in contact with him or ask this question from
him?
Thanks, 73
Zoli HA1AG
>
> I just looked at the Logplus homepage and saw Bob's statement,
> too bad !
> I don't think its a question of owing or not owing, last time
> I recall the right word was being honest or not.
>
> I remember paying Bob (by paypal) a year's subscription for
> upgrades, etc... and all I got was 1 upgrade, then he disapeared
> to work somewhere and forgot all about it.
> When Bob returned we kind of forgot all about this money we payed
> for nothing and now he says he doesn't owe us.
> Interesting... in Europe if we pay and a company doesn't provides us for
> what we bought we usually ask for a refund otherwise we always have
> the lawyers or the European Union consumer's court of law...
> I don't know how you guys do it in the US.
>
> Anyway the solution is to forget about that money we already payed and
> for forward to another software.
>
> (what about those guys that payed for the Windows Version that never
> existed ???)
>
> 73 Jose CT1EEB