[LOGic] Frequency in Logbook

[K0DAN]

I have used LOGIC and other logging programs (primarily N1MM) for 
conetsting. LOGIC does OK, but is a bit slower that the bare-bones contest 
loggers. LOGIC is so full featured, the database, cluster spotting, mapping, 
history log, etc., etc., just adds a a second or two to the processing time 
for log entries. It's not so bad if you're running a contest at an easy 
pace, but the no-frills contest loggers will be noticeably faster.

If on the other hand, you're running a multi-multi contest station with 
hopes of being a national or international winner, then LOGIC is probably 
the right tool for that type of contest operation.

The best thing to do is try LOGIC in a contest, and as someone said earlier, 
be sure you load and test the proper form before the contest starts. Also be 
sure to set contest date/times so you only log "real" contest info.

GL es 73
Dan
K0DAN

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Stan" <k9iuq at verizon.net>
To: "LOGic is open to all radio amateurs for discussion of LOGic logging 
program" <logic at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Monday, February 11, 2008 8:39 AM
Subject: Re: [LOGic] Frequency in Logbook


>I am a long time ham but a newbie when it comes to contesting. I have only 
>done 3 contests, 2 CQWW contest and the IL QSO party contest.
> Where does Logic 8 fall short in being a logger for contests? Since it has 
> 75 contest forms built in I had assumed it would at least be "adequate" 
> for contesting.
>
> If not Logic 8 for contesting then what logger is "adequate" for 
> contesting? There are at least 80 or so loggers out there. I don't want to 
> make a $$$$$ Mistake.
> In other words what features are important for logging in contests?
>
> I am primarily interested in CW contesting. Mostly do search and pounce. 
> Presently I have Mixw2 interfaced to Logic 8.
>
> Thanks for any input,
> Stan K9IUQ
>
>
>
>
> Jim Brannigan wrote:
>> I agree with Stan.  Contesting software and daily logging software 
>> satisfy different requirements.
>> Trying to get one package to "do it all" leads to compromises or software 
>> that does nothing well.
>>
>> Try a contest program this weekend (ARRL DX CW) you will be pleased. 
>> When done, import the QSO's to Logic.
>>
>> Jim
>>
>>> Stan:
>>> First of all Logic is not a good contest logging program and Dennis has 
>>> never claimed it to be one.  You can use it for one but there are lots 
>>> of other programs that are better for contests. I for instance use 
>>> Writelog which is an excellent contest logging program for all modes. 
>>> After the contest is over I export in ADIF format and import into Logic. 
>>> There is nothing that even comes close to Logic for everything else it 
>>> does.  Why don't you give Dennis a call and he will explain to you why 
>>> the mouse does not enter the radio info when you change fields.  I'm 
>>> sure if it made more since Dennis would have changed it a long time ago.
>>>
>>> Also all you have to do is enter the call sign in logic and press the 
>>> tab key for the initial logging and after that you can use your mouse to 
>>> your hearts content.  Although if you use one of the contest logging 
>>> forms you will find it a lot easier to tab to the next field that is due 
>>> rather than taking the extra time to use the mouse.
>>>
>>> 73' Lloyd, NX4W
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Stan" <k9iuq at verizon.net>
>>> To: "LOGic is open to all radio amateurs for discussion of LOGic logging 
>>> program" <logic at mailman.qth.net>
>>> Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 5:28 PM
>>> Subject: Re: [LOGic] Frequency in Logbook
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LOGic mailing list
> LOGic at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
>