[LOGic] Digital modes and LOGic8

[Jim Brannigan]

How about a PK-232 interface for Logic?
N1MM software works great for contests, but I would like a bit more than 
Logic provides for daily QSO's

Jim



> My experience has been that HamScope has a good "look and feel" and is 
> excellent with RTTY (because it used MMTTY).  It has not worked out well 
> for me on PSK31 though.  Too much garbage gets displayed.  MixW is much 
> better for PSK31.  Oh, and if you are the type who likes a CW decoder, 
> HamScope seems to work much better than MixW for CW.  The interface to 
> LOGic from either one is not very reliable.  You have to continually watch 
> LOGic to make sure you're logging what you think you're logging.  And of 
> course, don't forget, if you run MixW, you have to be sure to load it 
> FIRST before LOGic, or it will have COM port conflicts all over the place.
>
> Bottom line:  sure - it works - but not very "clean."  I wish the 
> programming made the digital interface more transparent.  Personally, I 
> have not found the HamScope and Telnet forms easy or convenient to use 
> which leads me to wonder why they're there.  I tried using them in a 
> recent digital contest, and gave up - and worked the contest from where I 
> should have started in the first place:  N1MM.