[LOGic] LOGic7 => LOGic8 migration glitches

[Bill W5WVO]

The update I was running with was a couple months old. Installing the latest 
update fixed the Worked Before checkbox problem. Thanks, Bob.

Any ideas on glitches #2 and #3?

Bill


Robert Carroll wrote:
> The "worked before" problem was present in the CD release of LOGIC 8
> and maybe in the first few updates.  BY any chance are you using one
> of these or the latest update?
>
> Bob W2WG
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: logic-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> [mailto:logic-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Bill W5WVO
> Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 12:39 AM
> To: [LOGic]
> Subject: [LOGic] LOGic7 => LOGic8 migration glitches
>
> I think I have LOGic8 mostly working, but there are a couple
> glitches...
>
> 1) The "Worked Before" indicator checkbox (to the right of the Call
> on the main Log form) doesn't work, even though the prior QSOs do
> show up in the "Other QSOs with..." form, and selected data from
> previous QSOs is correctly populated into the main log form when that
> call is entered again. The indicator box is the only part of this
> scenario that isn't working. Anybody know why?
>
> 2) The "busted call" lookup capability, when used from the Call field
> of the main log form, also triggers automatic callbook lookup using
> the wild-card call. Example: I type in "W5W?O" and hit Tab. I get a
> list of possible calls, but I also get auto-lookup of "W5W?O" in all
> the enabled callbooks one after the other as each one fails. I want
> to be able to use both these features without them interfering with
> each other! Does anyone know if there is a way to handle this in the
> existing version of LOGic8? If not... Simple solution: Auto callbook
> lookup should be inhibited from executing when Tab is pressed if
> there are wild card characters in the Call field.
>
> 3) Some reports that work fine in LOGic7 don't work (produce errors)
> in LOGic8. Is there anything I should know to do to prevent LOGic7
> reports from failing in LOGic8? Otherwise, I guess I'll have to
> troubleshoot these on a one-off basis.
>
> Bill W5WVO
> _______________________________________________
> LOGic mailing list
> LOGic at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
>
> _______________________________________________
> LOGic mailing list
> LOGic at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic