[Logic] ARRL Sections & VE Prov with LOGic 7
C.M. Christensen
[email protected]
Fri, 16 Jan 2004 23:39:36 -0600
Now I know it is getting late -- I am answering my own messages.
C.M. Christensen wrote:
> Hmmm! This is a bit of a mess. Here is what I have located for problems
> with the Logic 7 prefix tables.
>
> 1. T8 is not in the DXCC list -- it should be. It took the place of KC6
> Palau. KC6 should be changed in the Prefix Table to T8 and solve the
> problem once and for all.
>
I think I am just going to change KC6 to T8.
> 2. VO is in the DXCC list -- it should not be. Last I recall it was
> still a part of Canada and is therefore VE.
VO is checked as deleted so everything is OK with this one.
> 3. VP6 is not in the DXCC list -- it should be. VP6 is Pitcairn and
> VP6-D is Ducie.
Don't quite know what I am going to do with this but it is fixable.
Would be nice if we all had it the same way but I guess it don't matter.
>
> 4. SD is not in the ARRL Section list -- perhaps when I left there in
> 2000 and moved to Florida they sold the state. However, I was back there
> last summer and the signs were still up.
I called my daughter and she still lives in SD (poor girl) so I will
just add this to the list.
>
> 5. My "Update Awards Progress Info" run gave me some static about MN,
> NL, NEW, and LF not being in the VE prov. list. That is correct -- they
> are not there, however, nowhere on my log screen does it even mention
> these. All contacts are listed with VE as the DXCC entity and no mention
> is made of the prov. I have four contacts with VO2WL in my log and they
> are all listed as VE for the DXCC entity. The only variables are the
> time and date. Two were rejected and two were not.
>
Still not sure what is happening here but I will work on it tomorrow.
> 5. I was also notified that AM and SSTV are invalid modes.
>
This can also be fixed tomorrow.
> Also, the entity count is off. Part of it is because VO is listed as an
> entity but there is another one messed up some place.
>
Forget this -- the count is right because VO is marked deleted.
> I was tempted to copy my Logic 6 prefix table into Logic 7 but since the
> List of Valid Values has evidently been redone I am hesitant to do that.
> I have not even looked at the List of Valid Values yet. Every time I get
> in there my blood pressure rises until I am safely out of it. A screw up
> there can be worse than a train wreck.
> That is about it for now -- anyone have any ideas on any of this???
>
Good night all!!!
--
73,
Chris, AC�M