[Logic] ARRL Sections & VE Prov with LOGic 7

Fri, 16 Jan 2004 19:25:21 -0600

I understand about a possibly more accurate list but that dose not answer my
question. Suppose it has changed. Suppose my values in the log are the old
values and I fix the new data to be consistent with these values in my log.
Now let us suppose the data (section list in this case) ahs been changed and
the question is when happens when I log new data using the new values as I
must if I do it automatically with the call book or use values needed in a
contest or other reasons. Is there any way to have BOTH the OLD AND THE NEW
values accepted by the program? I am assuming that there is , that valid
values can be added, but wonder how difficult and time consuming that would
be or can I just EASILY merge the two data bases with no or almost no manual
work?

I see that the real problem that the other person had was a missing data
base, that the data has not changed sot the problem does not yet exist for
these values and so all this is just a what if situation?

Gil, W0MN http://webpages.charter.net/gbaron
N 44.082056  W 92.513024 1050'
Hierro Candente, Batir de repente

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
> Behalf Of Arthur Tan
> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 4:43 PM
> To: LOGic
> Subject: Re: RE: RE: [Logic] ARRL Sections & VE Prov with LOGic 7
>
>
> Hi Gil,
>
> If you feel confident that your ARRL SECT (or any other sub-list of
> data) within LOGic 6 is more accurate than what is in the lists of
> valid values within LOGic 7, then delete sub-list of data within LOGic
> 7 and import the same from LOGic 6.  Hope this makes sense...
>
> 73, Art AB4RL
>
> From rojomn:
>
> > What you have after the fix is no incorrect, right? It will now
> reject when
> > you try to use the new values, or does it merge them?
> > Better be careful here!
> >
> >
> > Gil, W0MN http://webpages.charter.net/gbaron
> > N 44.082056  W 92.513024 1050'
> > Hierro Candente, Batir de repente
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [email protected]
> [mailto:[email protected]]On
> > > Behalf Of Arthur Tan
> > > Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 3:00 PM
> > > To: LOGic
> > > Subject: Re: RE: [Logic] ARRL Sections & VE Prov with LOGic 7
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Gil,
> > >
> > > From rojomn:
> > >
> > > > Why do the rejects occur. It does not make sense to me that they are
> > > > accepted in one version and not in another? What am I missing here?
> > >
> > > I think that asome point there were probably changes made to the ARRL
> > > SECT and VE PROV list in LOGic 6 to conform to the (ever-changing)
> > > changes in such data.  LOGic 7's lists are composed of the non-changed
> > > data, thus there are differences and rejects occur.  KN6RO proposes
> > > the quick and easy fix.
> > >
> > > 73, Art AB4RL
> _______________________________________________
> LOGic mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
>