[Logic] Latest version of Logic???

[Carl Smidt]

Hi All,

Have you chaps tried to call and talk with Dennis directly on this subject?
Or even send him an e-mail.

Not that I intend this as a testimonial, but Dennis will jump through hoops
and do backward summersaults, if need be, in order to help you out on any
LOGic problem.

His product support effort is above and beyond the call of duty, he has
helped me on numerous occasions, to the point where, using MS Messenger, he
has even taken over my computer 'on-line' and fixed finger problems that I
was having.

I have NEVER had my e-mails go "unanswered" and I have been a LOGic user
since the early DOS days.

If you chaps want to have something included in a future update of the
program, contact Dennis directly and if it is possible it will be done,
sooner or later, quite often sooner.

If he is reticent about adding software update version numbers on his FTP
site, he obviously has a very good reason for it. Ask him and he will let
you know his reasons.

73,   Carl   VE9OV


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bob Johnson" <rjohnson@tmlp.com>
To: <logic@mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 4:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Logic] Latest version of Logic???


> Hi:
> This is one of my pet peeves with LOGic also.  It makes no sense to
> me either.  I can't see that it would do any harm and it would sure
> makes things easier for the user to know where he is version wise.
>
> As far as the "Only case of poor customer relations", there are many
> where the questions and inquiries are just go ignored, no reply at all.
>
> 73
> Bob, K1VU
>
> At 07:56 AM 07/08/03 , you wrote:
> >At 06:23 AM 7/8/2003, you wrote:
> >>Tough? you bet. I just can't understand why the version number isn't
part of
> >>the filename.
> >>
> >>This is so very typical in the CAD software industry. As part of my job,
> >>I'm responsible to ensure latest versions including patches are
downloaded
> >
> >This has been requested over and over but totally ignored by the author.
I
> >don't understand it either but we just have to live with it. Apparently
he
> >is for some unfathomable reason strictly opposed to doing it. He does not
> >say way, just totally ignores it. This is the only case of poor customer
> >relations I can point to with logic, very strange?
> >
> >
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >LOGic mailing list
> >LOGic@mailman.qth.net
>
><http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic>http://mailman.qth.net/mail
> man/listinfo/logic
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> LOGic mailing list
> LOGic@mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/logic
>