[Laser] photon flux for magnitude 6 stars
TWOSIG at aol.com
TWOSIG at aol.com
Thu Mar 30 22:26:02 EST 2006
This is an interesting topic. It may not contribute much, but I have a
question. I note that the numbers for photons per second are all based on
converting all of the energy output of a star (and our sun was used as a reference)
into monochromatic photons near the middle of the visual range. I think
that would be an excellent assumption for estimating the photons we can see
from a 6th magnitude star, if only the energy in the visible spectrum was used
instead of the total energy output. There is lots of spectrum we cannot see
above and below the visible.
So my question is: What is the fraction of a star's total energy output
that is visible? If the number is at least 10 percent, then the numbers in the
original post should be in the right order of magnitude.
This topic got me to thinking about "counting photons". If I want to
receive voice quality signals, can I expect to be able to do that if my system
receives 50,000 photons per second? I figure that for that quality, I need the
equivalent of more than 10,000 samples per second, so that only averages 5
photons per sample, so my samples range from zero to ten.
That seems far too ambitious even at 100 times that many photons.
Still, the idea of estimating the number of photons that I see when I look
up at a star helps me understand how big of an aperture I need to receive voice
signals that look about as bright.
James
N5GUI
More information about the Laser
mailing list