[Laser] Simple optical beacon experiment in San Diego
TWOSIG at aol.com
TWOSIG at aol.com
Mon Mar 13 23:59:21 EST 2006
Kerry
Thank you for sharing these experiments with us. It got me to thinking and
wondering.
I have some questions. If they are about something that you do not know the
answer to from what you have already done, please consider them suggestions
for further investigation. They may not be worth the effort to investigate,
but I hope they stir some thought in the group.
Can you see the LED from your observation point with the un-aided eye? In
darkness the eye will open to about 7mm and from what I understand about
binoculars a 7X50 will give an image area at about the same brightness. The 7X20
rifle scope should give an image about 16 percent as bright as the
binoculars. The LED would only be a point, so I am not sure if the relationship makes
sense. Also could you see any twinkling of the light from the LED? If it
is not easy to see the LED because of surrounding light sources, you might be
able to look through a tube to block some of that light.
If I understand your description, the ID is CW, not MCW. I would like to
know more about the way you set up the system. Was it a microcontroller
programed? And could the control link do more than just turn it on and off?
What is the focal length of the 4" glass lens on your receiver? What are
the dimensions of the photo detector? What I am wondering about is the field
of view of the sensor and how that relates to the noise sources you describe.
I have a simple 300 mm lens and one of my detectors is about 4.5 mm square.
If I used that at 8 miles, then it would see an area about 634 feet on a
side. For similar numbers on your setup, are the noise sources in that field
of view, or are they outside that range? If the latter, are you getting
reflections of light from the ground and objects in the field of view, maybe from
atmospheric scattering, or maybe from reflections in your receiver? I was
going to suggest that you try a 500mm or longer focal length telescope - 114 mm
would be about the same diameter as your 4" glass lens - to get a narrower
field of view, but it seems that is unlikely to help. Maybe an optical scope
would have been built with more experience eliminating stray light. It seems
like you have plenty of sensitivity in the detector, just too much
interference.
What are the light sources in the area? Sodium vapor, Mercury vapor,
incandescent, neon? It may be easier to find a filter for the gas discharge types
than for incandescent sources. There may also be a component in those noise
lights that relates to three phase power. I doubt that any single light will
have a 180 or 360 component, but there may be lights that group into three
sets of phase relationship.
I get lots of hum from incandescent lights, which I presume is 120 Hz. I do
not notice any strobing from the same source, so I am puzzled - it might be
that the electronic sensor is picking up only that small fraction of the
light from the lamp that is pulsing and my eye does not have the dynamic range
to see the strobe effects on top of the other light -- or it might be that
the hum I am hearing from the sensor is from the IR spectrum which I cannot see.
Since you are driving the LED with a square wave, can you detect the
harmonics of that?
Are you driving the LED at its rated current? Since you are running it at
700 Hz, have you considered running it at a higher current since you are only
50% duty cycle? If I tried it, I would probably ony go 150 percent, or at
least monitor the heat sink temperature. It might not be safe to increase the
drive current for the CW for your ID.
If you are considering some follow on testing, I can suggest a sine wave
driver circuit that can be keyed on and off fairly easily. It is a simple
circuit that I thought up while working on my AM LED demonstration. I only drive
30 milliamp, but it is linear and should scale up to what you want to use.
If I remember correctly the 1 watt LED runs about 350 milliamp. This AM
circuit, if adjusted for 250 ma and driven at 50 percent modulation would peak at
375 ma and then drop to 125 ma. If you have the ability to key different
lines, you should be able to set the modulation percentage, then step to another
level, say 10, 25, 50, 75, 100, and 125 percent modulation.
I hope I have given you some useful ideas. Thank you again for sharing your
work.
James
N5GUI
More information about the Laser
mailing list