[Lafayette] HE-10/KT-200

[Michael Clarson]

Bill: It also has 2 IF stages (S-38 had only 1). Interesting that the HE-30
had a section on using it for SSB in the manual, while the HE-10 did not.
These receivers were more in the HQ-100 class, not the S-38 class. Looking
over the manuals, the HE-30 used tubes that were more commonly used in the
US. Example: Audio out in the HE-10 was a 6AR5, while the HE-30 used a
6AQ5.  --Mike, WV2ZOW


On Wed, Jun 11, 2014 at 12:42 PM, W. Harris <nbcblue at hotmail.com> wrote:

> The HE-10/KT-200 also had an rf amplifier stage that made it a much better
> receiver than the S-38. The KT-200 coupled with a Heathkit Q-multiplier was
> my first Novice receiver. I still have a KT-200 that I stripped down to the
> chassis and completely rebuilt.
>
> Bill - K5MIL
>
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 12:35:52 -0400
> > From: Ken via Lafayette <lafayette at mailman.qth.net>
> > To: Discussion of radio equipment made by Lafayette
> > <lafayette at mailman.qth.net>
> > Subject: Re: [Lafayette] HE-30/HE-10 correction needed
> > Message-ID: <mailman.117.1402502414.31718.lafayette at mailman.qth.net>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> > One of the most significant differences between the HE-10/KT-200 and the
> early S-38 series was that the
> > HE-10/KT-200 had an AC power transformer and the S-38 series did not.
>
> > Pete, wa2cwa
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Lafayette mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lafayette
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Lafayette at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.qth.net/pipermail/lafayette/attachments/20140611/33befd50/attachment.html>