[Kenwood] TS2000 on VHF and UHF

[Steve]

Perfect thanks. I am Italian so no problem
-- 

Steven Restinetti
Sent from my Nokia N900
va3fm at hotmail.com
ve3sfv at gmail.com

----- Original message -----
> The recovered audio is clearer, the hiss span on low audio frequencies 
> on TS2000 so disturbing the received audio, while the hiss is 
> high-frequency on TS480, so the hear can discriminate more easily. Yes 
> You can play with the frequency response on the 2000, but it's not easy 
> and that shaping affect both noise and modulation. I think the 480 dsp 
> is superior than the 2000 dsp.
> I think that behaviour is due to the 2-conversions rather than 
> 4-conversion method. The more, the quartz filter of the 480 is better 
> "shaped" than the ceramic filters of the 2000.
> I cannot say nothing about high-level-signals behaviour.
> On my website www.ziomassimo.it I described some measurements about 
> 480/2000 receiving comprison but, halas, in italian.
> 73
> 
> Massimo i0mcf
> 
> 
> Il 10/11/2011 23.18, BIX ha scritto:
> > Massimo,
> >     Can you elaborate on what aspects you define "superior" of the 480
> > compared to the 2000?
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Steve
> > va3fm at hotmail.com
> > ve3sfv at gmail.com
> > VA3FM / VE3SFV
> > Grid: FN25OA
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: kenwood-bounces at mailman.qth.net
> > [mailto:kenwood-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Massimo
> > Corinaldesi Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 4:34 PM
> > To: kenwood at mailman.qth.net
> > Subject: Re: [Kenwood] TS2000 on VHF and UHF
> > 
> > I compared TS480 and TS2000 on hf, and from my point of view the TS480
> > is superior on receive performances.
> > About VHF-UHF I cannot say anything.
> > 
> > 73
> > 
> > Massimo   I0MCF
> > 
> > 
> > Il 10/11/2011 21.26, Joe ha scritto:
> > > I currently have a Kenwood 480 fore HF, and a fully loaded Yaesu
> > > 736R fore
> > VHF. Fore convenience of having all in one box, I'm thinking of
> > getting the Kenwood 2000. However I don't want to trade degraded
> > performance fore convenience, and I've heard the Yaesu 736r beats the
> > kenwood on receive. I know this is a Kenwood list, but has anyone had
> > experience with both the 736r and the Kenwood 2000 to give me a
> > comparison. The Yeasu is still a very sought after rig. Maybe I'd be
> > sorry if I did this. Thanks 73. Joe.
> > > ______________________________________________________________
> > > Kenwood mailing list
> > > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
> > > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > > Post: mailto:Kenwood at mailman.qth.net
> > > 
> > > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> > > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> > > 
> > ______________________________________________________________
> > Kenwood mailing list
> > Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> > Post: mailto:Kenwood at mailman.qth.net
> > 
> > This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> > Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> > 
> > 
>