[Kenwood] TS2000 on VHF and UHF

[BIX]

Massimo,
	Can you elaborate on what aspects you define "superior" of the 480
compared to the 2000?


Thanks,
Steve
va3fm at hotmail.com
ve3sfv at gmail.com
VA3FM / VE3SFV
Grid: FN25OA

-----Original Message-----
From: kenwood-bounces at mailman.qth.net
[mailto:kenwood-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Massimo Corinaldesi
Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 4:34 PM
To: kenwood at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: [Kenwood] TS2000 on VHF and UHF

I compared TS480 and TS2000 on hf, and from my point of view the TS480 
is superior on receive performances.
About VHF-UHF I cannot say anything.

73

Massimo  I0MCF


Il 10/11/2011 21.26, Joe ha scritto:
> I currently have a Kenwood 480 fore HF, and a fully loaded Yaesu 736R fore
VHF. Fore convenience of having all in one box, I'm thinking of getting the
Kenwood 2000. However I don't want to trade degraded performance fore
convenience, and I've heard the Yaesu 736r beats the kenwood on receive. I
know this is a Kenwood list, but has anyone had experience with both the
736r and the Kenwood 2000 to give me a comparison. The Yeasu is still a very
sought after rig. Maybe I'd be sorry if I did this. Thanks 73. Joe.
> ______________________________________________________________
> Kenwood mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:Kenwood at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
______________________________________________________________
Kenwood mailing list
Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
Post: mailto:Kenwood at mailman.qth.net

This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html