[Kenwood] DSP Speakers/Aftermarket products

[k8vf_mark at centurytel.net]

I have an MFJ 784-b DSP filter.

My experience with it is that it is about equal to the audio DSP in the ft 
920 transceiver.
I hooked it up on the 920 and went back and forth.

ALL of them remove the high frequencies, in my opinion and degrade reception 
IF you have high freq. hearing loss.

On cw they are marvelous.

Just one unpaid opinion.

K8VF
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike Besemer (WM4B)" <mwbesemer at cox.net>
To: "^ Kenwood List Server" <kenwood at mailman.qth.net>; 
<qrp-l at mailman.qth.net>; "^ SOC Mailing List" <soc at mailman.qth.net>; 
<070 at yahoogroups.com>; <TS-440 at yahoogroups.com>; <digipan at yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 10:52 AM
Subject: [Kenwood] DSP Speakers/Aftermarket products


> Please pardon the off-topic post, but I was wondering if anybody on the 
> list
> has any experience with any of the DSP speakers or other aftermarket DSP
> products currently available.
>
>
>
> I really can't afford (or justify, anyway) a new rig, but would like to 
> have
> SOME sort of DSP.  I see that a lot of the new rigs only have AF DSP 
> anyway,
> as opposed to IF DSP, therefore it occurred to me that an aftermarket
> product might not be too bad a deal.
>
>
>
> I'm running a TS-440SAT and operate primarily PSK-31 and CW.
>
>
>
> Any thoughts?
>
>
>
> -- de WM4B
>
> Mike
>
> Kathleen, GA
>
>
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Kenwood mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:Kenwood at mailman.qth.net
>
>