OT:replying to emails... was RE: [Kenwood] Re: Kenwood Digest, Vol 9,
Issue 14
Rick Bullon
kc5ajx at hotmail.com
Fri Jan 14 21:45:01 EST 2005
Hello All
I agree with Jeff when replying to emails all the unimportant stuff need to
be deleted. Also don't included every message in the thread when replying.
Now My pet peeve. If you get the messages from the list in digest form (
as Jeff does) Please Please changed the subject line from "Kenwood digest
Vol# Issue#) to something that makes sense.
Like I did in this reply
73
Rick
kc5ajx
P.S. I am leaving Jeff's message intact so as to show what I am talking
about
_______________________________________________________________________________
----Original Message Follows----
From: "WR2E" <wr2e at arrl.net>
Reply-To: WR2E <wr2e at arrl.net>
To: <kenwood at mailman.qth.net>
Subject: [Kenwood] Re: Kenwood Digest, Vol 9, Issue 14
Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 17:26:13 -0500
/rant on
Yes, there sure is a lot of junk on here lately!
Know what MOST of it is though ?
Guys who can't figure out how to CUT the junk out
of messages they reply to! How many "footers" does
a message need ? Some of these replies have been
replied to and re-posted so many times, that the
screen is FULL of "right arrows" ...
Please guys, have a heart... trim the "garbage" off
your replies! It only takes a few seconds to do so.
/rant off
73 de Jeff / WR2E
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 7
> Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 10:48:40 -0600
> From: "Keith V" <kavan at neb.rr.com>
>
> I' outta here along with Cliff. Way too much junk.
>
> Van,
> KL7TDZ
_______________________________________________
Win a new Icom IC-756PROIII and help QSL/QTH.net
Details at: http://mailman.qth.net/index.html
_______________________________________________
Kenwood mailing list
Kenwood at mailman.qth.net
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
More information about the Kenwood
mailing list