[Kenwood] CW Outdated Mode?
Keith V
kavan at neb.rr.com
Tue Jan 11 11:48:40 EST 2005
I' outta here along with Cliff. Way too much junk.
Van,
KL7TDZ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cyrus Turner" <w5dxe at hotmail.com>
To: <kenwood at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 10:35 AM
Subject: Re: [Kenwood] CW Outdated Mode?
> Really!!
> I agree with Clif. Where is the reflector moderator? I thought this
> reflector dealt with subject matter retaining to Kenwood amateur products
> and Kenwood amateur products alone. Not the politics of Pros and Cons of
> CW. Let's keep non KW subject matter off the reflector and respond to each
> other directly.This isn't a public soap box guys. There. That's my 2 cents
> worth.
> Cy/W5DXE
>
>>From: "Clif Holland" <clif at avvid.com>
>>To: "KU4YP" <ku4yp at verizon.net>, "Leigh S. Jones" <kr6x at kr6x.com>
>>CC: kenwood at mailman.qth.net
>>Subject: Re: [Kenwood] CW Outdated Mode?
>>Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2005 00:37:33 -0600
>>
>>I'm outa here, this isn't a CW discussion group.
>>
>>Clif Holland, KA5IPF
>>www.avvid.com
>>
>>
>>----- Original Message ----- From: "KU4YP" <ku4yp at verizon.net>
>>To: "Leigh S. Jones" <kr6x at kr6x.com>
>>Cc: <kenwood at mailman.qth.net>
>>Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2005 12:14 AM
>>Subject: Re: [Kenwood] CW Outdated Mode?
>>
>>
>>>agreed and well said OM.
>>>
>>>73 KU4YP
>>>
>>>Leigh S. Jones wrote:
>>>>This debate has howled on so long that I guess I'd be doing
>>>>amateur radio a disservice if I didn't add my comments.
>>>>
>>>>First, I need to make it very clear that I hold in low regard
>>>>anyone who uses language such as "outdated" to describe
>>>>Morse code. The truth is very simple. If everyone had the
>>>>skill needed to communicate in Morse code, then no one
>>>>would ever describe the code as "outdated". The code
>>>>may, some day, perhaps within this century, become
>>>>outdated. "Outdated" is an excuse -- a slander. When someone calls the
>>>>code outdated, he means that he, personally, does not possess the skill
>>>>needed to communicate in the code. He issues the false claim that
>>>>he is more modern than the code, thus he is above it.
>>>>The code can only be outdated when there is nothing to
>>>>be gained by its use by anyone.
>>>>
>>>>I see the relationship between amateur radio and the code in a different
>>>>light. To me, the code is like instrumental music. One can learn to
>>>>sing and to make music without instruments. Song in its purest form is
>>>>a
>>>>thing of beauty, but the world doesn't need to be limited
>>>>to acappella song. There can also be instrumental music.
>>>>Amateur Radio is the grandeur of such music. Some
>>>>will only sing, while others will gain the skills needed to
>>>>make music with an instrument.
>>>>
>>>>I also believe in separate subbands for the modes, really as a
>>>>convenience but also for more practical reasons.
>>>>The modes are best kept apart. It would take a very long time to
>>>>explain why, and one major idea per post
>>>>is a sensible plan.
>>>>
>>>>KR6X
>>>>
>>>>----- Original Message ----- From: "John Geiger" <johngeig at yahoo.com>
>>>>To: <k4pdm at yahoo.com>; <kenwood at mailman.qth.net>
>>>>Sent: Monday, January 10, 2005 11:59 AM
>>>>Subject: Re: [Kenwood] CW Outdated Mode?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>--- Paul Manuel <k4pdm at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>To my ear, the novice CW bands are little-used (and
>>>>>>should be refarmed
>>>>>
>>>>>No, the technician license should be eliminated, and
>>>>>the novice license brought back as the point of entry
>>>>>into amateur radio.
>>>>>
>>>>>73s John NE0P
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>
>>>>Win a new Icom IC-756PROIII and help QSL/QTH.net
>>>>Details at: http://mailman.qth.net/index.html
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Kenwood mailing list
>>>>Kenwood at mailman.qth.net
>>>>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
>>>>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
>>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>
>>>Win a new Icom IC-756PROIII and help QSL/QTH.net
>>>Details at: http://mailman.qth.net/index.html
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Kenwood mailing list
>>>Kenwood at mailman.qth.net
>>>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
>>>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
>>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>
>>Win a new Icom IC-756PROIII and help QSL/QTH.net
>>Details at: http://mailman.qth.net/index.html
>>_______________________________________________
>>Kenwood mailing list
>>Kenwood at mailman.qth.net
>>http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
>>Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's FREE!
> hthttp://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Win a new Icom IC-756PROIII and help QSL/QTH.net
> Details at: http://mailman.qth.net/index.html
> _______________________________________________
> Kenwood mailing list
> Kenwood at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.10 - Release Date: 1/10/2005
>
>
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.6.10 - Release Date: 1/10/2005
More information about the Kenwood
mailing list