[Kenwood] Modified VHF/UHF rigs
Rob Atkinson
k5uj at sbcglobal.net
Sun Aug 21 13:18:39 EDT 2005
You obviously were not a ham when Hallicrafters made the FPM300 HF
transceiver, or you were a ham then but never heard of, or owned one.
This dog (and there are many other dogs out there as well--how about
the eico 753?) was clearly designed by people at Northrop (after they
bought Hallicrafters) who had no idea how hams operate. Among the
several problems, the most glaring one was no cw offset. If you
place yourself at the mercy of the wisdom of some design engineer, you
doom yourself to a life of inferior performance because you believe
someone with a BSEE knows what's good for you better than you do.
If anyone wants more evidence of what can be done to improve
performance or longevity of equipment, go to mods.dk and take a look at
what you can do to a rig to improve it. How about a narrower roof
filter for example? My only problem is I wish I had more courage to
get into my gear and break something.
rob/k5uj
On Saturday, August 20, 2005, at 06:14 PM, VA3DG wrote:
> Paul K4PDM, wrote in part:-
>
> ***Modifying rigs is one of the things hams traditionally do.......***
>
> To which I reply, "I will never buy another used Amateur radio, for
> fear that it has been 'modified'."
>
> I buy radios for what they're designed by the manufacturers' engineers
> to do, not by what somebody thinks they should do and then messes
> around internally with them.
>
> Cheers....
> Darrell
> VA3DG/VE3DDG
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> Kenwood mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:Kenwood at mailman.qth.net
>
More information about the Kenwood
mailing list