[Kenwood] Re: Kenwood Digest, Vol 6, Issue 19

Tue Oct 19 13:23:38 EDT 2004

dude, read below and LEARN how to unsubscribe yourself!

On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 20:35:02 -0400, Radio Dude <hypergolic at comcast.net> wrote:
> unsubscribe please.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <kenwood-request at mailman.qth.net>
> To: <kenwood at mailman.qth.net>
> Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 6:11 AM
> Subject: Kenwood Digest, Vol 6, Issue 19
> 
> > Send Kenwood mailing list submissions to
> > kenwood at mailman.qth.net
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > kenwood-request at mailman.qth.net
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > kenwood-owner at mailman.qth.net
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of Kenwood digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> >   1. Re: BPL (Clark Savage Turner)
> >   2. Re: BPL (Clark Savage Turner)
> >   3. RE: BPL (Berry Griffin)
> >   4. BPL (Ron Lape)
> >   5. TS940 Lamps (jim best)
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:05:36 -0700
> > From: Clark Savage Turner <csturner at kcbx.net>
> > Subject: Re: [Kenwood] BPL
> > To: "Dan Cotsirilos" <dcsfree at worldnet.att.net>
> > Cc: kenwood at mailman.qth.net
> > Message-ID: <E8A30CC6-2077-11D9-84BF-0003937A2CB6 at kcbx.net>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
> >
> > On Oct 17, 2004, at 12:33 PM, Dan Cotsirilos wrote:
> >
> >> the rules are there are no rules. if it involves big business or the
> >> government the people stand no chance of winning in court.
> >
> > Not quite true.  I understand that there are some cases that defy
> > normal understanding, and that the scales are often tipped in favor of
> > the "bigger" interests, there are some rules that are respected by all
> > parties.  Thank goodness there are still some of them.  There are
> > important Court (and legislative) cases that go different directions
> > than just large special interests.  I find the press would tell another
> > story, but I don't usually believe the press has the complete story,
> > especially when writing about the law :-) (or heck, amateur radio!)
> >>
> >> WHEN THE PEOPLE STOP USING THE GOV TO CONTROL THE CORPS THEN THE CORPS
> >> WILL USE THE GOV TO CONTROL THE PEOPLE!
> >
> > I understand your sentiment here, as far as I can tell.
> >
> > I still think our efforts in BPL are well placed with our neighbors and
> > with the ARRL, we can make headway in the long run.
> >
> > Clark
> > WA3JPG
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 13:09:49 -0700
> > From: Clark Savage Turner <csturner at kcbx.net>
> > Subject: Re: [Kenwood] BPL
> > To: bcarling at cfl.rr.com
> > Cc: kenwood at mailman.qth.net
> > Message-ID: <7FE267DA-2078-11D9-84BF-0003937A2CB6 at kcbx.net>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
> >
> >
> > On Oct 17, 2004, at 12:34 PM, Brian Carling wrote:
> >
> >> On 17 Oct 2004 at 12:06, Clark Savage Turner wrote:
> >>
> >>> And, as someone else mentioned, we have no right to amateur radio.  It
> >>> is a privilege.
> >>
> >> Ah the concept of "rights."
> >> OTOH we have no "right" to anything.
> >> The Bill of Rights may assert things but if someone triumps
> >> it that is then not a right either.
> >>
> >> We have no right to food clothing etc.
> >> Might is right.
> >>
> >> That is sad but that is what we have come down to .
> >>
> >> Yes I do believe it is a downward negative trend.
> >> Righteousness is slipping fast IMHO.
> >
> > I don't think this way, there is a difference in a "right" to freedom
> > of speech (pretty good and possibly getting better under the so-called
> > "conservative" judges) and a "privilege" to use the public airwaves.
> > Think about it, the airwaves belong to the public, that makes perfect
> > sense.  No one has any special "right" to that, it should be used to
> > the benefit of the public in general.  Now, we can argue about what the
> > public benefit really is, that might be interesting.
> >
> > As amateurs, I think we have a big responsibility to justify our use of
> > spectrum.  We have done so quite well in the past, and must continue to
> > do so.  I don't quibble with that principle.  I just argue with some at
> > the FCC who don't value amateur radio contributions to the public
> > interest as much as I believe is due.
> >
> > Clark
> > WA3JPG
> >
> > P.S.  And I think I do it best with my Kenwood TS 850 !
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 14:02:18 -0700
> > From: Berry Griffin <serazin at pacbell.net>
> > Subject: [Kenwood] RE: BPL
> > To: Kenwood at mailman.qth.net
> > Message-ID: <4172DDDA.4070609 at pacbell.net>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
> >
> > Here is an interesting look at BPL from a technical standpoint from a
> > technial viewpoint.
> >
> > http://www.technewsworld.com/story/37378.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 4
> > Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 18:06:00 -0400
> > From: "Ron Lape" <k3mi at atlanticbb.net>
> > Subject: [Kenwood] BPL
> > To: "KENWOOD" <kenwood at mailman.qth.net>
> > Message-ID: <000701c4b495$7cd5f520$0465ffcf at k3mi>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="Windows-1252";
> > reply-type=original
> >
> > It's nice that everyone is so concerned but isn't it about time to use
> > this
> > forum for it's real purpose....Kenwood systems. 27 BPL's a day is enough.
> > No flames needed. I have already sent a registered complaint to the FCC
> > concerning BPL and have sent in messages for all but one of the requests
> > for
> > input.
> >
> > 73's Ron K3MI
> > Why do I have to swear on a Bible in court when the
> > Ten Commandments aren't allowed in the courthouse?
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 5
> > Date: Sun, 17 Oct 2004 14:04:37 -0600
> > From: "jim best" <james9194 at bresnan.net>
> > Subject: [Kenwood] TS940 Lamps
> > To: <kenwood at mailman.qth.net>
> > Message-ID: <000e01c4b484$879fdc20$6501a8c0 at fireball>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
> >
> >            I have my sub display problem fixed.  Clif was correct.  I
> > heated the joints
> >            on the voltage regulator and it works great.  I'm still
> > having the problem
> >            with the PLL when the radio is cold.  After warm up it works
> > fine.
> >
> >            One other question for you 940 owners.  I have a burned out
> > lamp in
> >            the S meter and both lamps in the sub display are burned
> > out.  Does
> >            anyone have a good substitute part number and source?
> >
> >            Thanks all for the help thus far.
> >
> >            73  de  Jim
> >            WU7G
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Kenwood mailing list
> > Kenwood at mailman.qth.net
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
> > Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> >
> >
> >
> > End of Kenwood Digest, Vol 6, Issue 19
> > **************************************
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Kenwood mailing list
> Kenwood at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
> 

-- 
Chuck Adkins K8CPA
E-mail:k8cpachuck at comcast.net
Personal Web Site:
http://k8cpachuck.home.comcast.net
Business Site:
http://www.axiscomputerrepair.cjb.net/