FW: [Kenwood] BPL

[Ed Swiderski]

    You would think they would be more interested in looking into wirless
access. Using the power lines just seems to me like antiquated technology.
But it sounds good to the masses. Guess that's why I'll never make it in
politics. I make to much sense.

Ed KU4BP

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Michael E. Rees" <docmickey at outdrs.net>
To: <bcarling at cfl.rr.com>; <kenwood at mailman.qth.net>
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 8:00 AM
Subject: RE: FW: [Kenwood] BPL


That isn't all.  Yesterday John Kerry was here in Las Vegas for the AARP
convention.  When asked about BPL, John Kerry said he is in favor of BPL.
He just said he supports BPL as a means of getting the internet to rural
areas so kids can have a better education and wants to push its installation
and use.  The point is he wants to push BPL.

KD7CVJ
Mike

HMC(SW)
USN Retired


-----Original Message-----
From: kenwood-bounces at mailman.qth.net
[mailto:kenwood-bounces at mailman.qth.net] On Behalf Of Brian Carling
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 4:07 AM
To: kenwood at mailman.qth.net
Subject: Re: FW: [Kenwood] BPL

BPL is NOT the greatest threat to HF radio for hams
at present. WINLINK is a far greater threat, and ARRL is
endorsing it.

Wait until one of these unattended high power digital
pests starts interfering with your QSO and you will understand.

On 15 Oct 2004 at 2:30, Daniel Seagraves wrote:

> On Thu, 14 Oct 2004, Mort Arditti wrote:
>
> > Here is a thought. Use maximum legal CW power,  use a directional
> > antenna and aim at the power lines. If the lines are close, it is
better.
> > Will this  cause interference to BPL? I don't know.
> > If the BPL supporters do not care about us, why should we care about
> > them. Besides, it could be fun.
>
> We can't cause deliberate interference. If the FCC finds out, you'll lose
> your ticket, and you can bet the BPL users will gripe about you whether
> you interfere with them or not.
>
> The only way we're going to continue to use HF as we do now is to come up
> with some whiz-bang error correction that can get a signal through S9+30
> of noise. The war is over, we lost, we have to deal with this. We can't
> just keep doing what we've always done and expect things to never change.
> It's just like the restrictions and changes made to pilots after 9-11.
> They have had to put up with major changes - They used to be able to
> cruize around and just look at the scenery without a "reason" to fly. They
> used to be able to invite kids up to the flight deck if they wanted to.
> Times have changed, and the past is gone forever. It doesn't matter if the
> change is for the better or not, we have to deal with it... or die.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kenwood mailing list
> Kenwood at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm
>



_______________________________________________
Kenwood mailing list
Kenwood at mailman.qth.net
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm

_______________________________________________
Kenwood mailing list
Kenwood at mailman.qth.net
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
Help: http://mailman.qth.net/subscribers.htm