[Kenwood] comments on 2000 rig

Thu, 31 Oct 2002 16:39:05 -0500

They are EXCELLENT blankers!.
Nonetheless, they will and do add distortion.
...Dave
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: "Dave Edwards" <[email protected]>
Cc: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 4:32 PM
Subject: Re: [Kenwood] comments on 2000 rig


> I disagree Dave, the 520 and 820 both have excellent, distortion free
> noise blankers. The later Kenwoods also had good blankers, but you had
> to adjust the threshold properly.
>
> 73, Jim W4KWD
> > 520S, 820, 830, all add distortion.
> > ...Dave
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Robert Lyons" <[email protected]>
> > To: "Dave Edwards" <[email protected]>
> > Cc: <>
> > Sent: Thursday, October 31, 2002 12:40 PM
> > Subject: Re: [Kenwood] comments on 2000 rig
> >
> >
> > > Dave Edwards wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Not particular to the 2000.
> > > > Noise blankers on every rig I've ever used cause distortion, and
should
> > > > NEVER be left on.
> > >
> > >
> > > Perhaps that's a characteristic of DSP-based noise blankers. On my old
> > > TS520, I left the NB on all the time, with no ill effects.
> > >
> > > - Bob, KI8AB
> > > - - -
> > >
> > > Your moderator for this list is:
> > > Larry Wilson KE1HZ [email protected]
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Kenwood mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
> >
> > - - -
> >
> > Your moderator for this list is:
> > Larry Wilson KE1HZ [email protected]
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Kenwood mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood
> - - -
>
> Your moderator for this list is:
> Larry Wilson KE1HZ [email protected]
>
> _______________________________________________
> Kenwood mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kenwood