[KCDXC] rebuttle to AK0A's jab at Missouri

Thu, 14 Nov 2002 08:58:20 -0600

Anybody can adjust figures to suit their needs.
----- Original Message -----
From: "tombaugh" <[email protected]>
To: "KCDXC Reflector" <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2002 8:21 AM
Subject: [KCDXC] rebuttle to AK0A's jab at Missouri


> Bill and others who don't have thin skin,
> (this is intended as a rebuttle to Bill's jab at Missouri contesters for
not
> holding up and equal number of operators in an earlier post)
>
> Since you started the hub bub...
>
> With the entries by
>
> AA0FO, AK0A, K0BJ (even though he's out of the circle), K0GY, K0LLS,
K0VBU,
> KG�UA, W0MW all from Kansas
> And AE9B, K0CA, K0OU, KB0VVT, KG�US, KG�UT (the last three in the same
> family) all from Missouri
>
> Using the ARRL DX SSB, DX CW, RTTY roundup, 10M, 160M, Sweepstakes SSB and
> CW contests.
>
> Here are the breakdowns
>                                     KANSAS  MISSOURI
> # Operators                       8                    6
> # Contest Entries               10                 11
> Total QSO's                    7663           9756
> Ave QSO / Contest         1066           1394
> Ave QSO/ Operator        958             1626
>
> So Bill, You can see from the statistics above that Kansas did in fact
have
> more operators (as you said) Even though K0BJ is outside the circle and
> accounted for 3031 or over 40% of the KS QSO's (way to go Bruce)
> You can also see that Missouri, due to our inferiority complex, gets more
> out of their operators, then Kansas does.
> What do you say about that?
>
> Tom Baugh
> AE9B
>
> _______________________________________________
> Connect to the W0MW Packetcluster:
> telnet to: w0mw.dynip.com
> KCDXC mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/kcdxc