[K6BW] CW Practice Tonight
K6 BBQ
bbq at ispwest.com
Thu Jul 22 16:37:28 EDT 2004
I would most likely need help if we go on 80 as I don't have an 80 mtr
antenna. I can get out to kentfield on 80 phone for Chet's net but
past that distance I don't get very good reports if being heard at all,
plus not being able to hear others in the net.
73
Rem
On Thursday, Jul 22, 2004, at 12:44 US/Pacific, lite65 wrote:
> Hi TR,
>
> I agree with you, 80 mtrs would be better for the practice sessions.
>
> The reason we were using 40 meters for starters was one of the guys can
> not get on 80 meters yet (as I understand it) I would like to use 80
> meters. It is sure a nice quiet band. Last night 40m band condx.
> improved and there was quite a bit of QRM around 7.045- a few QRPers
> and
> others taking advantage of the improved conditions.
>
> I understand a big class X solar flair is due this evening so don't
> know
> what the band will be like or if we will have a band.
>
> I think the first guy that gets on 7.045 should start calling for K6BW
> and not wait around for anybody. In the past, I start calling 5 minutes
> early as a place holder.
>
> Of course we can all agree to go up higher on 40 mtrs. --say 7.065 If
> we need to.
> or use that freq. as an alternate if 7.045 is too crowded.
>
> What does every one else think?
>
> Bill
> KF6RMK
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> K6BW mailing list
> K6BW at mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/k6bw
>
More information about the K6BW
mailing list