[K6BW] Fw: MRP40 vs MixW
Bill Smith
[email protected]
Fri, 18 Jul 2003 10:37:04 -0700
----- Original Message -----=20
From: Bill Smith=20
To: Peter Bland=20
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 10:36 AM
Subject: Re: MRP40 vs MixW
Hi, Peter
I have copied this e-mail to our reflector, think others may be =
interested
also. Hope this is ok.
I am not surprised re MixW. MixW is a great program to "reach for" when =
you
hear a strong digital signal. Except for MT-63, I haven't found the =
various
mode emulations in MixW all that robust for weak signals. Perhaps you
noticed the difficulty I had during the demonstration when I attempted =
to
decode a CW signal.
I just don't know what digital activity is on the ham bands. 40 and 20
meters used to be the hot spots, and one of the small WRC bands (think =
the
10mhz frequency) is essentially restricted to CW and digital modes.
Band conditions have been very unsettled this summer. The MARS group =
was
actively experimenting with various modes at the beginning of the year.
Amtor is still the most popular MARS digital mode even with its =
recognized
weaknesses.
Poor radio conditions, training with a new traffic-net protocol and the
experience from those experiments has reduced use of modes other than =
Amtor
and MT-63. You might listen, though, just above 4005 KHz and just below
7350 KHz. Several traffic nets are active, ours starts at 6:00pm local,
7-days a week. The digital experimentation net is at 7:00pm local. I
think you mentioned you may be at the meeting tomorrow, you could ask =
around
there.
73 de Bill, AB6MT
[email protected]
----- Original Message -----
From: Peter Bland
To: Bill Smith
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 11:21 PM
Subject: MRP40 vs MixW
I have run these two programs side by side on the same signal and I am
getting a much better translation from MRP40 on CW only. MRP40 also
automatically seeks the strongest signal from the spectrum and adjusts =
to
the speed and frequency automatically. I have yet to find any other =
digital
signals to check MixW out on. Peter
--- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
multipart/alternative
text/plain (text body -- kept)
text/html
The reason this message is shown is because the post was in HTML
or had an attachment. Attachments are not allowed. To learn how
to post in Plain-Text go to: http://www.expita.com/nomime.html ---