[Johnson] Ranger problem solved

richard radke rar100 at excite.com
Wed Sep 24 22:52:05 EDT 2008


couldn't agree more Dave..wish i had a dollar for every time i search  
for a bug, long after the tube tested good, hi
Rick W9WS




On Sep 24, 2008, at 2:31 PM, David C. Hallam wrote:

> My take on tube testers is; If the tube tester says a tube is bad, it
> probably is.  If it says a tube is good, don't believe it.
>
> David
> KC2JD/4
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: johnson-bounces at mailman.qth.net
>> [mailto:johnson-bounces at mailman.qth.net]On Behalf Of Carl Yaffey
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2008 2:48 PM
>> To: johnson at mailman.qth.net
>> Subject: [Johnson] Ranger problem solved
>>
>>
>> My Ranger problem has been solved. It was indeed a bad clamper tube
>> (6AQ5) even though it tested OK.
>> Thanks for all the help!
>> 73,
>> Carl Yaffey  K8NU
>> Banjo, guitar, bass, mandolin, dobro lessons.
>> Pro Tools recording studio.
>> carl_yaffeyNO_SPAM at yahoo.com.
>> 614 268 6353, Columbus OH
>> http://www.carl-yaffey.com
>> http://www.grassaholband.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Johnson mailing list
>> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/johnson
>> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
>> Post: mailto:Johnson at mailman.qth.net
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> Johnson mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/johnson
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.html
> Post: mailto:Johnson at mailman.qth.net
>



More information about the Johnson mailing list