[ILQSO] ILQP upcoming

[Eric Lorenz K9LGE]

Understood...That being said though... it would be nice to see a build up
in populaity of the "standard" contest digital modes for ILQP.

On Fri, Sep 20, 2024, 5:27 PM Dennis Miller via ILQSO <ilqso at mailman.qth.net>
wrote:

>
>
>  I’m slightly indifferent on the non CW digital modes.
> We have a guy here that doesn’t do SSB because of his hearing, even with
> hearing aids, so he does FT8, etc. He turns in a small log but it’s a log,
> which is better than no log!
> And if the only fixed station in say, Williamson, Johnson, Pope, Hardin,
> Saline, Gallatin, etc is running FT8 only, then so be it.
> But, I definitely see Chuck KI9A’s point that time spent on FT8 could be a
> lost mult for the rest of us.
> So, I remain Switzerland on this one. But I tell the guys here to forego
> any mode that’s not ph/cw because it’s a waste of time for ILQP.
>
>
> 73 Dennis KM9O
> GROL PG00045411
>
>     On Friday, September 20, 2024 at 08:07:35 AM CDT, ka9fcz--- via ILQSO <
> ilqso at mailman.qth.net> wrote:
>
>   My vote is to NOT ALLOW any FT4 or FT8 contacts.
> 73
> Chris KA9FCZRichland County
>     On Thursday, September 19, 2024 at 08:22:23 PM CDT,
> n9jfcountyhunter at gmail.com <n9jfcountyhunter at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>  Sunday, October 20, 2024 is the upcoming Illinois QSO Party.  I've not
> said
> much about it so far since, frankly, I've been busy with other stuff.  That
> doesn't mean it's not still important and CLOSE!!
>
>
>
> Please send your plans either to the reflector or to W9DP or N9JF directly,
> and the activity map will be updated starting soon.
>
>
>
> The rules on the website https://w9awe.org/ilqp/  have been updated but
> probably will still get some tweaking.
>
>
>
> For one thing, the "Unlimited" category DOES HAVE A SPONSORED PLAQUE  for
> 2024.  Pretty much anything goes there with multiple operators and
> transmitted signals under one callsign.  I have not given a lot of thought
> to the implications, but we'll see what happens.  My initial thought is
> that
> this should be for portable operations, not fixed.  Thoughts?
>
>
>
> A question that is posed frequently concerns FT4 and FT8 contacts.  Yes,
> they are permitted.  HOWEVER ... I have yet to see anyone submit a log with
> such contacts that conform to the "all contacts much include the county,
> state, province or country of the station contacted".  This information
> must
> be logged on the air, not by a web search.  Thoughts on this?  Disallow FT4
> and FT8?  Or let people use their ingenuity?  I would not personally go to
> the trouble to try to get people to send me that information, during the
> contest, on those modes; but it could be done by "free form texts".
> Thoughts?
>
>
>
> Much more later.I'm just getting started...
>
>
>
> 73, Jim N9JF
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> ILQSO mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ilqso
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:ILQSO at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
> ______________________________________________________________
> ILQSO mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ilqso
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:ILQSO at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> ______________________________________________________________
> ILQSO mailing list
> Home: http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ilqso
> Help: http://mailman.qth.net/mmfaq.htm
> Post: mailto:ILQSO at mailman.qth.net
>
> This list hosted by: http://www.qsl.net
> Please help support this email list: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html