[ILQSO] Your favorite state QSO Party?

[Hank Greeb]

Steve:

"Should be" is a matter of judgement. 

"Too complicated" may be a matter of perception.

Ever consider the attractiveness to the common operators who really like 
the multiple counties?  Seems like many "contest committees" make 
decisions on the basis of what they like, not necessarily what the 
participants like.  Or, they're stuck with "conventional contest 
thinking" which fits their perception of what a contest "should be."

73 de n8xx Hg

Steve Woodruff wrote:

>not being the best cw op..... i usually end up asking for repeats when someone sends me multiple counties at once during qso parties.  :)
>
>Steve N9OH
>
>
>----- Original Message ----
>From: Jim Reisert AD1C <jjreisert at alum.mit.edu>
>To: Illinois QSO Party <ilqso at mailman.qth.net>
>Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 6:33:47 PM
>Subject: Re: [ILQSO] Your favorite state QSO Party?
>
>At 04:10 PM 3/20/2007, Mel Crichton wrote:
>
>  
>
>>Like Illinois, Indiana QSO party permits county line operation, but only two counties at a time.
>>    
>>
>
>And that's the way it should be, IMO.  It makes it too complicated to submit for the MARAC awards when the person is on a 3- or more county "line".
>
>73 - Jim AD1C
>