[ILQSO] FW: electronic submissions

[John Geiger]

I would like to see electronic submissions just for
the ease of submission.  Last year I logged using NA,
which was nice for dupe checking, etc.  Still had to
figure out the final score by hand.  I then had to
print out the log, mail it in, etc.  Electronic
submission sure is nice.  

I figured that in the past paper logs were
crosschecked for exchange errors, busted callsigns,
etc, so I really wouldn't expect any greater scrutiny
for electronic logs.  

Wish someone could develop a NA template that would
score the ILQP including bonus 8 QSO mults and the
like.

73s John NE0P
>From the very rare and instant pileup causing section
of Oklahoma
--- James Funk <jfunk@fossnorthamerica.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> "Once you open a can of worms, the only way to get
> them back is to get a
> bigger can."  Zymurgy's Law
> 
> *If* electronic logs are accepted for the ILQP,
> should those logs be
> subjected to closer scrutiny than the paper logs?
> 
> If tools are available to closely check electronic
> logs for busted callsigns
> and exchanges, should this be done?  What penalties
> should be assessed?
> 
> Why or why not?
> 
> Should electronic logs be required if computer
> logging is used (as ARRL
> requires)?
> 
> 73, Jim N9JF (feeling frisky on a sunny Thursday
> afternoon....)
> 
> 
> 
>  
> _______________________________________________
> ILQSO mailing list
> ILQSO@mailman.qth.net
> http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/ilqso


__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! SiteBuilder - Free, easy-to-use web site design software
http://sitebuilder.yahoo.com