[ICOM] INRAD roofing filter for 756PRO

[John Geiger]

Thanks for the reply Darrell  Sounds like it is worthwhile addition to a
756 series.

73 John AF5CC

On Sat, Aug 12, 2017 at 9:58 PM, AB2E Darrell <ab2e at hotmail.com> wrote:

> Hi John,
>
> For my two cents, probably the best bang for your buck out there. I went
> from a 756 Pro II (no Inrad filter), to a used 756 ProIII w/Inrad installed
> by an Icom Service Center. It made a big difference, steeper filter
> response, could work very close in to loud stations and copy the weak ones.
>
> I operated from VE3 and my host had an original 756Pro but had added the
> Inrad filter. Even that radio became much more usable in a contest.
>
> I now use a 7800 and still have the ProIII w/Inrad filter in service. I
> have a K3 but mostly use that for dxpeditions.
>
> 73 Darrell AB2E
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net <icom-bounces at mailman.qth.net> on
> behalf of John Geiger <af5cc2 at gmail.com>
> Sent: Saturday, August 12, 2017 10:26 PM
> To: ICOM Reflector
> Subject: [ICOM] INRAD roofing filter for 756PRO
>
> Has anyone added an INRAD roofing filter to their 756PRO series radio?
> Does it really make a dramatic improvement in performance?  Did it seem
> worth the money?
>
> 73 John AF5CC
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC: icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
> The Icom Information and FAQ Page - QSL.net<http://www.qsl.net/icom/>
> www.qsl.net
> The Information and FAQ Page. This new page will serve as a technical
> resource, link repository and FAQ input point for Icom radio owners and
> users.
>
>
> To support QSL/QTH.net: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC: icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
> To support QSL/QTH.net: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>