[ICOM] QST - 7600
John Geiger
aa5jg at yahoo.com
Fri Oct 9 15:42:27 EDT 2009
I would also take the 7600 over the 7700 because it does dual receive, something missing on the 7700. I know technically it is dual watch, but it does allow me to receive on 2 different frequencies at the same time.
73s John AA5JG
--- On Fri, 10/9/09, Jan Robbins <swanman at cfu.net> wrote:
> From: Jan Robbins <swanman at cfu.net>
> Subject: Re: [ICOM] QST - 7600
> To: "ICOM Reflector" <icom at mailman.qth.net>
> Date: Friday, October 9, 2009, 12:37 PM
> I would certainly think Hans is
> right, that 7600/7700/7800 receiver
> performance is "very
> close". Simply looking at the circuitry suggests
> that. Still, on-air
> performance at this QTH, plus
> some external professional testing, favored the 7700.
> On the other
> hand, look at the price tags of the three radios. If
> performance
> of all three is "very close," and you don't need 200w
> output, why
> wouldn't the 7600 be the "best buy?"
>
> Jan
>
> Hans Remeeus wrote:
> > Receiver performance between the 7600/7700/7800 is
> very close:
> >
> > http://www.remeeus.eu/ham-radio-english/transceivers/qst-product-reviews.html
> >
> >
> > 73,
> > Hans Remeeus (PA1HR)
> > http://www.remeeus.eu
> > Communication is about people, the rest is
> technology.
> >
> >
> > John Geiger schreef:
> >> --- On Fri, 10/9/09, Jan Robbins <swanman at cfu.net>
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The
> >>> receiver data is
> >>> especially impressive, coming out vy nearly as
> good as the
> >>> 7700, which
> >>> is Icom's best.
> >> Does the 7700 beat the 7800 in receiver
> performance?
> >>
> >> I admit, the QST review of the 7600 is very
> tempting.
> >>
> >> 73s John AA5JG
> >>
> >
> >
> > __________ Informatie van ESET NOD32 Antivirus, versie
> van database viruskenmerken 4408 (20090908) __________
> >
> > Het bericht is gecontroleerd door ESET NOD32
> Antivirus.
> >
> > http://www.eset.com
> >
> >
> > ----
> > Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC: icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> > Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> > Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
> > To support QSL/QTH.net: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
> >
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Text inserted by Panda IS 2009:
> >
> > This message has NOT been classified as spam. If
> it is unsolicited mail (spam), click on the following link
> to reclassify it: http://localhost:6083/Panda?ID=pav_1781&SPAM=true&path=C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Jan\Local%20Settings\Application%20Data\Panda%20Security\Panda%20Internet%20Security%202009\AntiSpam
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
>
> ----
> Your Moderator: Dick Flanagan K7VC: icom-owner at mailman.qth.net
> Icom Users Net: Sundays, 1700Z, 14.316 MHz
> Icom FAQ: http://www.qsl.net/icom/
> To support QSL/QTH.net: http://www.qsl.net/donate.html
>
More information about the Icom
mailing list